首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

高校社科学报经典引文的编校问题
引用本文:潘国琪. 高校社科学报经典引文的编校问题[J]. 韶关学院学报, 2007, 28(11): 11-14
作者姓名:潘国琪
作者单位:北京师范大学,学报编辑部,北京,100875
摘    要:部分高校社科学报经典著作引文校对质量不高,没有差错的为零,差错率高的居多;差错类型有“无故下岗型”、“胡乱加塞型”、“随意替补型”、“查无此人型”、“莫名其妙型”、“新瓶旧酒型”、“张冠李戴型”等七种;差错的原因多种多样:有的是认识上存在误区,有的是经验不足,有的是太自信,有的是过于依赖作者,等等;引用经典著作应采用最新版本,因最新版本或是翻译质量更高、更好,或是经过修订后校正了旧版本上的诸多差错,准确度更高。引用经典著作是一件严肃的事,必须高度重视,严肃对待。

关 键 词:高校社科学报  经典著作引文  编校质量
文章编号:1007-5348(2007)11-0011-04
修稿时间:2007-09-05

Problems of Editing and Proofreading of Classic Work Citation in Journals of Social Sciences in Universities
PAN Guo-qi. Problems of Editing and Proofreading of Classic Work Citation in Journals of Social Sciences in Universities[J]. Journal of Shaoguan University(Social Science Edition), 2007, 28(11): 11-14
Authors:PAN Guo-qi
Affiliation:Editorial Department of Journal, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Abstract:Part of the journals of social sciences have a low quality in editing and proofreading of classic work citations. No zero era'or rate of all these journals and most have a high level error rate. The types of error are various, and the causing reasons are various. While citing classic works, the latest edition should be adopted, for the new edition usually has a higher quality of translation, or more accurate by making corrections on the old version. As a whole, citation of classic works is a serious matter, and we should take it seriously and have a high regard to it.
Keywords:journals of social sciences in Universities   classic work citation   editing and proofreading
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号