首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

也谈礼貌的相对性——兼评Brown和Levinson的“面子保全论”
引用本文:卢小军.也谈礼貌的相对性——兼评Brown和Levinson的“面子保全论”[J].上饶师范学院学报,2011,31(4):64-69.
作者姓名:卢小军
作者单位:上海交通大学外国语学院,上海200240;上海外国语大学研究生部,上海200083
摘    要:Brown和Levinson的"面子保全论"是一种策略性的礼貌理论,适合描写和解释西方文化中的礼貌现象,对崇尚集体主义的东方文化解释力不强。同时,不同文化中表示礼貌的方式和方法以及人们用以判断礼貌的标准具有差异性,所以礼貌是相对的。Brown和Levinson的礼貌理论忽略了中西"面子"的文化差异,没有区分真实礼貌与虚假礼貌,也未提及礼貌与文化语境的关系,因此具有明显的缺陷和不足。

关 键 词:面子保全论  相对性  不足

On the Relativity of Politeness——some critical comments on Brown & Levinson's “face- saving theory”
LU Xiao-jun.On the Relativity of Politeness——some critical comments on Brown & Levinson's “face- saving theory”[J].Journal of Shangrao Normal College,2011,31(4):64-69.
Authors:LU Xiao-jun
Institution:LU Xiao-jun1,2(1.School of Foreign Languages,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China,2.Graduate School,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 200083,China)
Abstract:Brown and Levinson's Face-saving Theory is the theory that accounts for the redressing of the affronts to face posed by face-threatening acts to addressees.This theory works well in western cultures which highlight individualism,but may not suit eastern cultures which are characteristic of collectivism.Since the ways to show politeness and the criteria for politeness differ greatly from one culture to culture,we then argue that politeness is not universal but culturally relative by nature.Brown and Levinson...
Keywords:face-saving theory  relativity  problematic  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号