首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

严嵩研究刍议
引用本文:刘献忠,龚丽春,谢禾生,万桃涛.严嵩研究刍议[J].新余高专学报,2004,9(6):4-8.
作者姓名:刘献忠  龚丽春  谢禾生  万桃涛
作者单位:新余高等专科学校,江西,新余,338031
基金项目:新余高专2004年立项校级重点课题《严嵩研究》的阶段性成果。
摘    要:目前,史学界仍普遍坚持严嵩为“奸臣”的传统论点,但同时对一些有关严嵩的传统史料也一直存有争议。在简要介绍前人对严嵩的相关研究成果的基础上,从有关严嵩“媚君邀宠,窃弄威柄”,“残害忠良”,“废弛边防”,“贪污受贿”这四个方面谈了一些看法,认为虽然严嵩确有不少值得非议之处,但他在历史上也做过不少有意义的事情,曾起过积极的作用,这些客观历史业绩是不应被有意淡化甚至抹杀的。

关 键 词:严嵩  明世宗  奸臣  历史业绩
文章编号:1008-6765(2004)06-0004-05
修稿时间:2004年10月28

Research into Yan Song
LIU Xian-zhong,GONG Li-chun,XIE He-sheng,WAN Tao-tao.Research into Yan Song[J].Journal of XinYu College,2004,9(6):4-8.
Authors:LIU Xian-zhong  GONG Li-chun  XIE He-sheng  WAN Tao-tao
Abstract:At present the historic circle sticks to the traditional view that Yan Song was a treacherous court official, meanwhile there is argument about the historic materials of Yan Song. On the basis of the research result of Yan Song, the paper presents the authors' view about Yan Song from four aspects, that is, currying favour with the emperor and usurping power, framing the faithful and innocent, eliminating the birder defense and embezzling money and accepting bribes. It thinks that although Yan Song was a disputable person, he did many significant things in history, which should not be neglected.
Keywords:Yan Song  Ming Shizong  Treacherous court official  Historic achievements
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号