| 邓析"两可说"的博弈论分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 蔡亦骅.邓析"两可说"的博弈论分析[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,20(1):95-97. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 蔡亦骅 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京大学,哲学系,江苏,南京,210093 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 邓析的“两可说”历来被视为是诡辩。如果我们用博弈论为工具来分析“两可说”的最为著名的一个事例“赎尸博弈”，可以说明，“两可说”的建议完全符合博弈论理论要求，决非诡辩。
|
| 关 键 词： | 邓析 “两可说” 博弈论 “赎尸博弈” 诡辩 中国 逻辑史 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-8934(2004)01-0095-03 |
Analysis of Game Theory on Dengxi's "Liang Ke Shuo" |
| |
| CAI Yi-hua.Analysis of Game Theory on Dengxi''''s "Liang Ke Shuo"[J].Studies In Dialectics of Nature,2004,20(1):95-97. |
| |
| Authors: | CAI Yi-hua |
| |
| Abstract: | Liang Ke Shuo" of Dengxi used to be regarded as a sophism. If the most famous case of 'Liang Ke Shuo', which was named 'Bargaining for the Body', is analyzed via Game Theory, it will be explicit that 'Liang Ke Shuo' totally agrees with the demands of the Game Theory and it will not be regarded as a sophism any more. |
| |
| Keywords: | Dengxi Liang Ke Shuo sophism Game Theory |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
