首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

民事对抗制之利弊评析
引用本文:张婷. 民事对抗制之利弊评析[J]. 长春师范学院学报, 2012, 0(5): 24-27
作者姓名:张婷
作者单位:华东政法大学研究生教育院
基金项目:华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养专项资金资助项目(101020)
摘    要:民事对抗制以当事人双方的平等对抗和法官中立听证为基本特征,其灵魂为程序自由主义。本文汇总了向来关于民事对抗制的各方观点,对其中较为主要的批评进行了集中回应,肯定了对抗制的价值。主要观点为:第一,在民事程序领域,对抗制优于职权制;第二,对抗性的强弱应当与民事案件的性质、标的大小、复杂程度和重要程度成正比。

关 键 词:对抗制  职权制  程序自由主义  发现真实  效率

Advantages and Disadvantages of Adversarial System in Civil Practice
ZHANG Ting. Advantages and Disadvantages of Adversarial System in Civil Practice[J]. Journal of Changchun Teachers College, 2012, 0(5): 24-27
Authors:ZHANG Ting
Affiliation:ZHANG Ting(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
Abstract:The basic characteristics of adversarial system in civil practice are equal contending of both parties and neutral position of judge hearing,with the spirit of procedural liberalism.In this article,the author summed up all perspectives regarding adversarial system in civil practice,focused on main criticisms among those viewpoints,and emphasized the value of adversarial system.The author’s main points are: Firstly,considering the applicability of civil procedure,adversarial system model is better than reformed inquisitorial system model;Secondly,the intensity of adversary should be in direct proportion with the character,target,complexity and significance of the civil cases.
Keywords:adversarial system  reformed inquisitorial system  procedural liberalism  the search for truth  efficiency
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号