Withdrawing Unfalsifiable Hypotheses |
| |
Authors: | Lorenzo Magnani |
| |
Institution: | (1) Computational Philosophy Laboratory, Department of Philosophy, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 6, I-27100 Pavia, ITALY E-mail;(2) School of Public Policy and College of Computing, Program in Philosophy, Science, & Technology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 685 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0345, USA E-mail |
| |
Abstract: | There has been little research into the weak kindsof negating hypotheses. Hypotheses may be unfalsifiable. In this case it is impossible tofind a contradiction in some area of the conceptualsystems in which they are incorporated.Notwithstanding this fact, it is sometimes necessaryto construct ways of rejecting the unfalsifiablehypothesis at hand by resorting to some external forms of negation, external because wewant to avoid any arbitrary and subjectiveelimination, which would be rationally orepistemologically unjustified. I will consider akind of ``weak' (unfalsifiable) hypotheses that arehard to negate and the ways for making it easy. Inthese cases the subject can ``rationally' decide towithdraw his hypotheses even in contexts where it is``impossible' to find ``explicit' contradictions: theuse of negation as failure (an interestingtechnique for negating hypotheses and accessing newones suggested by artificial intelligence) isilluminating. I plan to explore whether this kind ofnegation can be employed to model hypothesiswithdrawal in Poincaré's conventionalism of theprinciples of physics and in Freudian analyticreasoning. |
| |
Keywords: | conceptual change negation falsification conventionalism diagnostic reasoning |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|