首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

BENEFITS AND COSTS IN SELECTING FUEL FOR MUNICIPALITY HEATING SYSTEMS WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
作者姓名:Mirosaw DYTCZAK  Grzegorz GINDA
作者单位:Faculty of Management and Engineering Production Opole University of Technology,Opole,Poland,Faculty of Management and Engineering Production,Opole University of Technology,Opole,Poland
基金项目:This work was financially supported by the Rector of Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.
摘    要:1. Introduction Real technical systems are complex in nature. Their complexity arises not only from technology, but also from their multidisciplinary nature. Therefore, to make an effective choice out of a limited, but very different set of available alternatives, a multi-criteria approach is required. To assess the value of existing alternatives there are different methodologies that could be applied e.g. Multi-Attribute Utility Technique (MAUT) (Keeney and Raiffa, 1976), Data Envelopmen…

关 键 词:市政经济  层次分析法  区域供热系统  热能资源  节能

Benefits and costs in selecting fuel for municipality heating systems with the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Miros?aw Dytczak,Grzegorz Ginda.BENEFITS AND COSTS IN SELECTING FUEL FOR MUNICIPALITY HEATING SYSTEMS WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS[J].Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,2006,15(2):165-177.
Authors:Miros?aw Dytczak  Grzegorz Ginda
Institution:Faculty of Management and Engineering Production, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland
Abstract:Municipal economy problems are of a complex nature. Existing requirements for sustainable development make us apply various criteria while solving these problems. These can, for example, include economic, financial, social and environmental criteria. To handle them effectively, multi-criteria analysis should be applied. Decisions about heat production and delivery systems belong to such multidisciplinary problems. They were usually resolved in the past using classical numerical methodology that took into account only the technical and economic merits of the various alternatives. By applying multi-criteria tools instead it is possible to obtain more realistic results and make more effective decisions. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) seems to be a good alternative to fill the existing gap between decision-making as it is actually practiced and the traditional methods when applied to selecting district heating (DH) systems. This paper presents such an application. Our application is to select the best heat energy source for a DH system for a medium sized city located in Poland. Our results led to an interesting conclusion with regard to the best heat energy source. Our results suggest that intensifying the effort to make widespread the use of more efficient, but financially more costly, energy sources is the best.
Keywords:AHP  municipal economy  district heating systems  heat energy sources  optimization  MCDM  sustainable development
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号