| 庄子与济慈的美学思想比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴瑞裘.庄子与济慈的美学思想比较[J].龙岩学院学报,2002(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴瑞裘 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 庄子和济慈都反对人的异化,呼唤自然人性的复归,认为这样才能达到真美的统一、庄子主张“法天贵真”,以真为美;济慈肯定艺术的美,以美为真。庄子主张“坐忘”、“心斋”,济慈提倡“消极的能力”,他们都强调“忘我”,要创造一个超脱世俗利害观念的空明心境,开拓审美心胸。庄子主张“心游”,济慈肯定想象,都是为了追求精神自由的境界,这正是一种高度的审美境界。
|
| 关 键 词： | 真美统一 “坐忘” “消极的能力” “心游” 想象 |
Comparison of the Aesthetic Ideas of Zhuang Zi and Keals |
| |
| WU Rui - qiu.Comparison of the Aesthetic Ideas of Zhuang Zi and Keals[J].Journal of Longyan Univercity,2002(2). |
| |
| Authors: | WU Rui - qiu |
| |
| Institution: | WU Rui - qiu |
| |
| Abstract: | Both Zhuang Zi and Keals were against the alienation of mankind, and they both called for the return of human nature. They thought that only in this way could the unification of truth and kindness be realized. Zhuang Zi insisted on imitating the Nature , truth being valuable and truth being beautiful; and Keats considered arts being beau-tiful and beauty being true. Zhuang Zi proposed forgetting one' s own figure and desire and getting rid of one' s selfish ideas ; but Keats advocated the negative capability . They both emphasized forgetting oneself , creating a super mundane and free idea and opening one' s aesthetic mind. Zhuang Zi advocated freethinking and Keats proposed imagination. Both of them pursued a free mental state, which was a high degree aesthetic mind. |
| |
| Keywords: | unification of truth and kindness forgetting one' s own figure and desire "negative capability freethink-ing imagination |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
