首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

人工智能法律主体资格研究
引用本文:吴高臣.人工智能法律主体资格研究[J].自然辩证法通讯,2020(6):20-26.
作者姓名:吴高臣
作者单位:首都师范大学政法学院
摘    要:人工智能实体能否成为法律主体存在争议。基于理性是法律主体判断标准这一通说,传统法学倾向于否定人工智能的法律主体地位。其实,自然人和非自然人法律主体遵循着不同的判断标准。理性是自然人法律主体的判断标准,拟制是非自然人法律主体的判断标准。据此,更应重视法律主体制度的法律技术价值,人工智能具有成为法律主体的合理性,以合理分担人工智能带来的风险责任。但从现实性出发,人工智能成为法律主体尚待时日。

关 键 词:人工智能  法律主体  理性  拟制

Research on the Legal Subject Status of Artificial Intelligence
WU Gaochen.Research on the Legal Subject Status of Artificial Intelligence[J].Journal of Dialectics of Nature,2020(6):20-26.
Authors:WU Gaochen
Institution:(College of Political Science and Law,Capital Normal University,Beijing,100089)
Abstract:It is controversial whether AI entities can become legal subjects.Based on the general theory that reason is the standard of legal subjects,traditional jurisprudence tends to deny the legal subject status of artificial intelligence.In fact,the legal subjects of natural and non-natural persons follow different criteria.Rationality is the standard of natural persons,and fiction is the standard of non-natural persons.Therefore,more attention should be paid to the legal technical value of the legal subject system.In order to share the risk responsibility brought about by AI reasonably,AI has to become a legal subject.However,it will take time for AI to become the legal subject in consideration of social reality.
Keywords:Artificial intelligence  Legal subject  Rationality  Fiction
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号