| 优选论理论下英语“X-self”和汉语“自己”的对比研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 丁冉.优选论理论下英语“X-self”和汉语“自己”的对比研究[J].长春大学学报,2009,19(9):34-36. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 丁冉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 徐州师范大学外国语学院,江苏徐州221116 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 英语＂X-self＂和汉语＂自己＂都可以出现在宾语语域,但二者在充当宾语时所表现出来的约束性不同。在优选论指导下,制定了二者在句型＂NP1＋V1P1（PP1）＋NP2＋V2P2＋R＂中的约束等级,并考察了影响二者约束性的各种因素之间的关系。结果表明：英语＂X-self＂的约束等级和汉语＂自己＂的约束等级既含有不同的原则也含有相同的原则;正是由于不同的原则,造成了在英语和汉语中句法结构完全相同的句子而二者约束性的不同。
|
| 关 键 词： | X-self 自己 优选论 约束 |
Contrastive study of X-self in English and ziji in Chinese based on Optimality Theory |
| |
| DING Ran.Contrastive study of X-self in English and ziji in Chinese based on Optimality Theory[J].Journal of Changchun University,2009,19(9):34-36. |
| |
| Authors: | DING Ran |
| |
| Institution: | DING Ran(School of Foreign Study,Xuzhou Normal University,Xuzhou 221116,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | BothX-selfin English and ziji in Chinese can be used as an object in a sentence,however,their binding characters are different in many aspects.This paper mainly studies kinds of factors which influence their binding characters to formulate the binding degrees in the pattern of NP1+V1P1(PP1)+NP2+V2P2+Rbased on Optimality Theory.The results show that both similar and different principles are found in their binding degrees,which contributes to their different binding characters even in the sentences with the i... |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
