| 中国古代文论中"意""象"渊源简论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李东琴. 中国古代文论中"意""象"渊源简论[J]. 井冈山学院学报, 2004, 0(Z1) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李东琴 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 福建师范大学文学院 福建 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "意"象"在早期的古代文论中本是单独的概念,随着文学批评的逐渐丰富发展,二者也不断被赋 予不同的内涵,它们以不同的内涵对文学现象进行品评,并最终形成"意象"这样一个抽象的文学批评理念, "象"、"意"、"意象"作为一种文学特征和美学现象,影响了整个古代文论。本文即对这三个重要的文学批评理念 进行一个追本溯源的简论,以求教于方家。
|
| 关 键 词： | 意 象 意象 |
The Brief Comment on the Origin of "Meaning" and "Image" of Ancient Revievcs of Literature in China |
| |
| LI Dongqin. The Brief Comment on the Origin of "Meaning" and "Image" of Ancient Revievcs of Literature in China[J]. Journal of Jinggangshan University, 2004, 0(Z1) |
| |
| Authors: | LI Dongqin |
| |
| Abstract: | "Meaning"and "Image"are originally two separate concepts inancient literature reviews , with the gradual development of literature criticism,they both have been constantly endowed with different connotations and have commented on various literary phenomena,finally,the two concepts have been merged into "imagery"which a single and abstract idea of literary criticism.The three concepts as literature feature and aesthetic phenomena affect the whole ancient reviews of literature.This paper will make a brief comment on them. |
| |
| Keywords: | meaning image imagery |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
