| 两种合理性的冲突--胡风和"讲话派"文学批评标准比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 胡海. 两种合理性的冲突--胡风和"讲话派"文学批评标准比较[J]. 孝感学院学报, 2004, 24(2): 78-81 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 胡海 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河北大学,人文学院,河北,保定,071002 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "讲话派"批评强调政治标准第一,艺术标准第二,胡风则有三方面的标准:启蒙的标准;救亡的标准,胡风把它统一到启蒙要求中;美学的标准,相当于艺术标准,但他视其为文学必不可少的基点而非第二位的.救亡压倒启蒙,政治压倒文学是胡风和"讲话派"冲突的根本原因.归根结底,这是两种合理性之间的冲突.
|
| 关 键 词： | 胡风 " 讲话派" 文学批评标准 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-2544(2004)02-0078-04 |
Hu Feng and the "Talking"School:Criterion Conflicts of Literary Criticism |
| |
| HU Hai. Hu Feng and the "Talking"School:Criterion Conflicts of Literary Criticism[J]. JOURNAL OF XIAOGAN UNIVERSITY, 2004, 24(2): 78-81 |
| |
| Authors: | HU Hai |
| |
| Abstract: | The "Talking"School insists that the political criticism comes before the artistic criticism,whereas Hu Feng explains his criticism criterion in three aspects of Initiating,Saving and Aesthetics.Hu believes Saving is inside Initiating and aesthetic criticism,correspondingly artistic criticism,is no at all the second place.The main difference of the two schools was rooted from that politics overpowers literature,which is quite understandable. |
| |
| Keywords: | Hu Feng,the " Talking" school,literary criticism criterion, |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
