试论“浑言”“析言”的几个问题

"浑言""析言"这一对术语所指称的词义通别之理在训诂学上的三个问题:1 词义通别之理在《尔雅》《毛传》《方言》中已经得到相当充分的体现,西汉的训诂学家已有一些语言学学理自觉地指导训诂实践,训诂学在西汉已告成立;2 历来训诂在词义通别处理上的失当,主要原因是对"语言"和"言语"的关系缺乏认识;3 从词义通别角度考察"同义连文"现象,词义通别之理是判断同义连文属于词还是非词的本质因素。

On Several Questions of "Hunyan(浑言)" and "Xiyan(析言)"

This article focuses on three questions on exegesis relating to the general meaning and specific meaning of "Hunyan" and "Xiyan": 1) The theory of the general meaning and specific meaning is fully embodied in\% Literary Expositor (Erya), Mao's Commentary(Maozhuan)\% and \%Dictionary of Local Expressions(Fangyan)\%. Thus, we can make a conclusion that the exegesisists in the Western Han Dynasty practised their exegesis under the guidance of some linguistic principles. The Western Han Dynasty saw the founding of exegesis. 2) It's the lack of recognition of the relation between "language" and "speech" that leads to the criterion on advantage and disadvantage of dealing with the general specific meaning.3) The author thinks that the theory about the general specific meaning of words is the essential factor which can distinguish word or non word from the Tongyifuci segments. And we must observe the Tongyifuci segments from the aspect of general specific meaning of words.