首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

鼻咽癌调强适形放疗与常规放疗比较分析
引用本文:邱波,张雪琦,李艳明.鼻咽癌调强适形放疗与常规放疗比较分析[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版),2015(6):764-766.
作者姓名:邱波  张雪琦  李艳明
作者单位:北华大学附属医院,吉林 吉林,132011;北华大学护理学院,吉林 吉林,132013
基金项目:吉林省教育厅科学技术研究项目
摘    要:目的分析比较鼻咽癌患者调强放疗与常规放疗的优势.方法 70例鼻咽癌患者随机分为两组,调强放疗组(IMRT)35例,常规放疗组(CRT)35例.IMRT组靶区为鼻咽肿瘤、咽旁间隙和颈部淋巴区,放射剂量DT 70 Gy;CRT组采用面颈联合野加颈部切线野照射,原发灶根治量为DT 70~72 Gy,颈部预防治疗量DT 50 Gy.结果 IMRT组和CRT组总有效率分别为94.3%和85.7%,口腔黏膜反应Ⅳ级两组分别为0例和2例,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05).结论鼻咽癌调强放疗比常规放疗有明显优势.

关 键 词:鼻咽癌  调强放疗  常规放疗  总有效率  黏膜反应

Analyzing and Comparing of IMRT and Conventional Radiotherapy on NPC
Abstract:Objective To analyze and compare the advantages of IMRT and conventional radiotherapy of NPC patients. Method 70 cases with NPC are divide into two groups: 35 cases in IMRT group and 35 cases in conventional radiotherapy ( CRT) . To the IMRT group,the targets are neoplasms,parapharyngeal space,cervical lymph node areas and DT 70 Gy;To the CRT group,the methods are face-neck joint field plus neck tangential field irradiation,with the treatment amount of primary tumor cure being DT 70~72 Gy and the treatment amount of prevention and treatment of cervical area being DT 50 Gy. Results The total effects of the IMRT group and the CRT group were 94. 3% and 85. 7%,respectively;the oral mucosa reactions with gradeⅣwere no case and two cases,respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0. 05). Conclusion The IMRT has an obvious advantage than the conventional radiotherapy of NPC patients.
Keywords:NPC  IMRT  conventional radiotherapy  total effect  mucosa reactions
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号