首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不平整激励下机场道面和公路路面
引用本文:凌建明,刘诗福,袁捷,雷晓萍.不平整激励下机场道面和公路路面[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(4):0519-0526.
作者姓名:凌建明  刘诗福  袁捷  雷晓萍
作者单位:同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室, 上海 201804,同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室, 上海 201804,同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室, 上海 201804,中国民航机场建设集团公司, 北京 100621
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51278364); 国家自然科学基金(51308412)
摘    要:针对目前我国机场道面平整度评价主要沿用高速公路标准体系,提出一种机场道面和公路路面平整度评价的建模与分析方法.建立飞机和汽车动力学模型,选取飞机和汽车竖向加速度响应作为评价指标,提出基于Matlab/Simulink模块仿真分析的流程.以代表机型和车型作为试验对象,在不平整铺面激励下考查竖向加速度响应的差异;并解析运行速度、组成构造、前后轮距、质量分配系数、振动元件、质量和转动惯量等因素对飞机和汽车动力学响应差异的影响程度.最后,根据波音公司疲劳标准,反算机场道面国际平整度指数(IRI)与3 m直尺下最大间隙的标准值,提取机场道面管理的重要的决策参数.

关 键 词:机场道面    平整度    动力学模型    竖向加速度响应    评价标准
收稿时间:2016/1/24 0:00:00
修稿时间:2017/1/19 0:00:00

Comprehensive Analysis of Pavement Roughness Evaluation for Airport and Road with Different Roughness Excitation
LING Jianming,LIU Shifu,YUAN Jie and LEI Xiaoping.Comprehensive Analysis of Pavement Roughness Evaluation for Airport and Road with Different Roughness Excitation[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2017,45(4):0519-0526.
Authors:LING Jianming  LIU Shifu  YUAN Jie and LEI Xiaoping
Institution:Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongii University, Shanghai 201804, China,Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongii University, Shanghai 201804, China,Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongii University, Shanghai 201804, China and China Airport Construction Group Corporation, Beijing 100621, China
Abstract:Considering the fact that the present roughness evaluation criterion of airport pavement still uses that of highway, this paper presented the comprehensive analysis of the roughness evaluation of airport pavement and road surface. By building kinetic models of aircraft and car, and taking vertical acceleration response of aircraft and car as evaluation index, a simulation analysis process based on Matlab/Simulink was conducted. Taking the representive aircraft and car as test subjects, this paper examined the differences in vertical acceleration response on rough pavement excitation, and analyzed the influence of speed, composition structure, front and rear track, quality distribution coefficient, vibrating element, quality and moment of inertia on the dynamic response of car and aircraft. Finally, according to the Boing taxi fatigue life criteria, the criteria value of IRI and the biggest gap under 3 m straight edge for the roughness evaluation of airport pavement were back calculated respectively, investigating the important decision parameters for airport pavement management.
Keywords:airport pavement  roughness  kinetic model  vertical acceleration response  evaluation criteria
点击此处可从《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号