首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同审计选聘模式下财务舞弊行为演化的比较分析
引用本文:田芸林,陈萍. 不同审计选聘模式下财务舞弊行为演化的比较分析[J]. 西北民族学院学报, 2013, 0(3): 74-78
作者姓名:田芸林  陈萍
作者单位:[1]天津理工大学管理学院,天津300384 [2]西北民族大学管理学院,甘肃兰州730030
基金项目:国家民委科研项目(12XBZ006).
摘    要:管理者选聘和报告使用者选聘是常见的两种注册会计师选聘模式.选聘模式不同,则上市公司管理者与注册会计师的行为演化呈不同特征.文章通过建立非对称演化博弈模型,比较分析了两种模式下上述博弈主体行为选择的演变特征及趋势.结果表明:当采取舞弊策略的管理者在独立和不独立审计条件下的平均额外收益均为负时,两种模式对应的博弈主体行为选择会趋同,反之则有差异.另外,从演化趋势看,管理者选聘模式下出现的“合谋舞弊”现象,在报告使用者选聘模式下不会出现.

关 键 词:审计选聘模式  财务舞弊  管理者  注册会计师  演化稳定策略

A Comparative Analysis of the Behavior Evolution of Financial Fraud under Different Audit Selection Modes
TIAN Yun-ling,CHEN Ping. A Comparative Analysis of the Behavior Evolution of Financial Fraud under Different Audit Selection Modes[J]. Journal of Northwest Minorities University(Natural Science ), 2013, 0(3): 74-78
Authors:TIAN Yun-ling  CHEN Ping
Affiliation:1. Management College of Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China; 2. Management College, Northwest University for Nationalities, Lanzhou 730030, China)
Abstract:The manager selection and shareholder selection are two kinds of CPA selection mode in common.For the different selection modes, the behavior evolution of listed company's managers and CPAs showed the different characteristics. By establishing the asymmetric evolutionary game model, we compared and analyzed the evolution and trend of the behavior choice of the above game players under different selection modes. We obtained the following results: for anyone strategy of CPA, if the average extra income of manager with the fraud strategy is negative, the behavior choices of the corresponding game players under two selection modes have the same trend, otherwise there exists a difference. In addition, from the evolutionary trend, "collusion" phenomenon will appear in the manager selection mode, but not in the shareholder selection mode.
Keywords:Audit selection mode  Financial fraud  Manager  CPA  Evolutionary stable strategy
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号