首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

政府补贴对京津冀雾霾防控策略的区间博弈分析
引用本文:周珍,邢瑶瑶,孙红霞,蔡亚亚,于晓辉. 政府补贴对京津冀雾霾防控策略的区间博弈分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(10): 2640-2648. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2017)10-2640-09
作者姓名:周珍  邢瑶瑶  孙红霞  蔡亚亚  于晓辉
作者单位:1. 首都师范大学 管理学院, 北京 100089;2. 北京工商大学 商学院, 北京 100048;3. 北京交通大学 经济管理学院, 北京 100044;4. 北京物资学院, 北京 101149
基金项目:北京市自然科学基金(9152002);北京市教委社科计划面上项目(0142132014);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(17YJC630203)
摘    要:本文利用模糊数学理论和合作博弈论,分别从民众、企业以及政府的角度综合考虑治理雾霾需要的直接治理成本、经济发展成本、社会稳定成本以及社会健康成本,建立京津冀雾霾非合作治理模型以及区间合作治理博弈模型,分别计算了京津冀在非合作与合作情况下雾霾的治理成本、不治理成本以及治理策略,并考虑政府补贴对京津冀治理策略的影响,利用区间Slhapley值对最小的政府补贴进行分配.结论表明:没有政府补贴,京津冀三地均无法负担雾霾治理成本;相对于非合作治理模式,合作治理雾霾时政府所需的补贴最少.

关 键 词:合作博弈  雾霾防控策略  政府补贴  Shapley值  区间数  
收稿时间:2016-12-09

Interval game analysis of government subsidies on haze governance in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei
ZHOU Zhen,XING Yaoyao,SUN Hongxia,CAI Yaya,YU Xiaohui. Interval game analysis of government subsidies on haze governance in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei[J]. Systems Engineering —Theory & Practice, 2017, 37(10): 2640-2648. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2017)10-2640-09
Authors:ZHOU Zhen  XING Yaoyao  SUN Hongxia  CAI Yaya  YU Xiaohui
Affiliation:1. School of Management, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089, China;2. Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China;3. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;4. Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing 101149, China
Abstract:Based on the theory of fuzzy mathematics and cooperative game, this paper measures haze costs thoroughly from social health costs of people, direct control cost and opportunity costs of enterprises, social stability costs of government. Firstly we present haze prevention and control strategy model using interval cooperative game over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. Then haze costs for governing or not in Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei are calculated separately by non-cooperation and cooperation game. Finally we also analyze the haze governance strategy influenced by government subsidy in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and allocate minimum government subsidy among them. The conclusion shows that Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei are unable to bear the cost of governance haze without government subsidies; and the required government subsidies is minimum while the grand coalition works.
Keywords:cooperative game  haze prevention and control strategy  government subsidy  Shapley-value  interval number  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《系统工程理论与实践》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《系统工程理论与实践》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号