首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于库存错放的供应链RFID投资均衡策略
引用本文:张李浩,范体军,刘斌. 基于库存错放的供应链RFID投资均衡策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(12): 3079-3087. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2017)12-3079-09
作者姓名:张李浩  范体军  刘斌
作者单位:1. 上海海事大学 物流研究中心, 上海 201306;2. 华东理工大学 商学院, 上海 200237;3. 上海海事大学 经济管理学院, 上海 201306
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(71601114,71431004,71571117)
摘    要:本文以单制造商和双寡头竞争零售商组成的分散决策供应链为研究对象,基于零售商是否投资无线射频识别(radio frequency identification,RFID)技术,分别构建了链上成员不投资RFID(N情景)、零售商1投资RFID(L情景),零售商2投资RFID(F情景),及链上成员均投资RFID(T情景)的收益模型,求解出相应的最优解并探讨链上成员RFID的投资均衡策略.研究发现:零售商获得的批发价与其是否投资RFID相关,与其竞争者RFID投资策略无关.相较于N情景,F情景对零售商1的收益产生负外部性;当RFID成本较低时,L情景对零售商2的收益产生正外部性.当RFID成本较低时,供应链的均衡策略为T情景;当RFID成本较高时,供应链的均衡策略为L或F情景取决于零售商的错放率大小.

关 键 词:RFID  库存错放  Stackelberg博弈  均衡策略  
收稿时间:2016-06-22

Equilibrium strategies of RFID adoption in the supply chain with inventory misplacement
ZHANG Lihao,FAN Tijun,LIU Bin. Equilibrium strategies of RFID adoption in the supply chain with inventory misplacement[J]. Systems Engineering —Theory & Practice, 2017, 37(12): 3079-3087. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2017)12-3079-09
Authors:ZHANG Lihao  FAN Tijun  LIU Bin
Affiliation:1. Logistics Research Center, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China;2. School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;3. School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
Abstract:This paper studies a two-stage decentralized supply chain that consists of a monopoly manufacturer and two oligopoly retailers. We accordingly set up the players' profit models under four scenarios:none of the players adopts RFID (Scenario N), only Retailer 1 adopts RFID (Scenario L), only Retailer 2 adopts RFID (Scenario F), and all players adopt RFID (Scenario T). We obtain the players' optimal decision-variables and revenues. Furthermore, we discuss the equilibrium strategies of RFID adoption in competitive retailers' supply chain. We find that the retailer's wholesale price is related to whether invests in RFID or not, meanwhile, it is unrelated to the competitor's RFID investment strategy. Compared to the Scenario N, it causes Retailer 2 to have positive externality in Scenarios L when the RFID cost is low, however, it causes Retailer 1 to have negative externality in Scenarios F. When the RFID cost is low, Scenario T is the equilibrium strategy for the supply chain. When the RFID cost is higher, the equilibrium strategy for the supply chain is L or F, depending on the retailers' misplaced rates.
Keywords:RFID  inventory misplacement  Stackelberg game  equilibrium strategies  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《系统工程理论与实践》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《系统工程理论与实践》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号