面向科研基金项目评审的专家水平评价方法

科研基金项目评审工作的成败很大程度上取决于评审专家的水平。为此，提出了一种面向科研基金项目评审的专家水平评价方法。首先，对专家以往评审科研基金项目情况和获得科研基金项目情况两方面的评价指标进行描述，并给出评价指标的计算公式；然后，通过构建评审专家水平的二维坐标评价图对备选评审专家进行初筛；在此基础上，给出了一种基于TOPSIS(Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution)的专家水平评价方法。通过实例分析验证了该方法的实用性和有效性，为科研基金项目评审的专家遴选提供了决策支持。

Approach to Evaluating Level of Experts for Assessment of Science Research Projects

The level of experts is a decisive factor for the success and failure of the review of science research projects.An approach to evaluating the level of experts for the assessment of science research projects is proposed. The evaluation indexes related to the situations on the science research projects reviewed by experts and obtained by experts are described, respectively, and computation formulas of the evaluation indexes are presented. Then, alternative experts are screened by the constructed bi dimension coordinate system. An approach based the TOPSIS(Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method is proposed to obtain the rank of the rest experts. And an illustrative example is used to show the practicality and validity of the proposed approach. The proposed approach can provide decision support to expert selection for the assessment of science research projects.