| 形而上的“价值”与形而下的“用法”——索绪尔与后期维特根斯坦意义理论比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘艳茹. 形而上的“价值”与形而下的“用法”——索绪尔与后期维特根斯坦意义理论比较研究[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2012, 0(2): 1-5 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘艳茹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 吉林大学文学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(11YJA740055) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在西方哲学的语言转向中,索绪尔和维特根斯坦在语言哲学领域中分别作出了不同贡献。在意义理论中,两者既有相同之处,也有相异之处。相同之处在于二者都提出了对命名论的批判、都恪守整体主义的意义观,相异之处在于二者对于判定意义的标准不同,索绪尔提出了形而上的"价值"决定论,维特根斯坦提出了形而下的"用法"决定论,而二者意义观的不同是他们语言观差异的体现。
|
| 关 键 词： | 索绪尔 维特根斯坦 意义 价值 用法 |
Metaphysical Value and Physical Usage:A Study of Meaning Theory between Saussure and Post-Wittgenstein |
| |
| LIU Yan-ru. Metaphysical Value and Physical Usage:A Study of Meaning Theory between Saussure and Post-Wittgenstein[J]. Studies In Dialectics of Nature, 2012, 0(2): 1-5 |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Yan-ru |
| |
| Affiliation: | LIU Yan-ru(The College of Humanities at Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | In the linguistic turn of western philosophy,Saussure and Wittgenstein did great contribution on philosophy of language.Both of them made similarities and dissimilarities on meaning theory.The similarities lie in the criticism on naming theory and observation of holism while the dissimilarities rest with the distinctive standards on criticizing meaning.Saussure advances value-determinism from metaphysical aspect on the contrary Wittgenstein advances usage-determinism from physical aspect.Their distinctive views on meaning are decided by their different outlooks on language. |
| |
| Keywords: | Saussure Wittgenstein Meaning Value Usage |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
