A study and critique of the teaching of the history of science and technology. Interim report by the committee on undergraduate education of the history of science society (U.S.A.) |
| |
Authors: | Harold Issadore Sharlin Stephen G Brush Harold L Burstyn Sandra Herbert Michael S Mahoney Nathan Sivin |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of History , Iowa State University , Ames, Iowa, 50010;2. University of Maryland , College Park;3. William Paterson College;4. University of Maryland , Baltimore County;5. Princeton University;6. Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| |
Abstract: | A great deal is known about the technical issues surrounding the introduction of Hugo De Vries's mutation theory and the subsequent development of the modern genetical theory of natural selection. But so far little has been done to relate these events to the wider issues of the time. This article suggests that extra-scientific factors played a significant role, and substantiates this by comparing De Vries's respect for the original Darwinian spirit with Thomas Hunt Morgan's use of the mutation theory as part of an attack on the whole philosophy of Darwinism. In particular, it is argued that Morgan's attitude was dictated by his moral objections to the picture of a world dominated by struggle. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|