首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

常规HLA基因分型方法的比较
引用本文:陈雪黎,罗玫,周琼秀,林鹤,杨刘,陈强. 常规HLA基因分型方法的比较[J]. 四川大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 45(1): 424-426
作者姓名:陈雪黎  罗玫  周琼秀  林鹤  杨刘  陈强
作者单位:中国医学科学院输血研究所;中国医学科学院输血研究所;中国医学科学院输血研究所;中国医学科学院输血研究所;中国医学科学院输血研究所;中国医学科学院输血研究所
摘    要:比较序列特异性引物聚合酶链反应(PCR-SSP)和流式磁珠反向序列特异性寡核苷酸杂交法(reverse sequence specific oligonucleotide,RSSO)在造血干细胞捐献者资料库四川分库捐献者DNA的HLA基因分型中的应用优劣.对造血干细胞捐献者资料库109份样本同时用RSSO和PCR-SSP方法检测,并分析HLA-ABDR结果.109份样本用流式磁珠反向SSO杂交法所检测的HLA-ABDR分型一次成功率为100%;而PCR-SSP方法所检测的HLA-ABDR分型结果合格率为约98.1%.RSSO和PCR-SSP两种方法均可用于骨髓库样本检测,但侧重不同.

关 键 词:HLA分型   PCR-SSP   RSSO

Comparison of routine HLA gene typing methods
CHEN Xue-Li,LUO Mei,ZHOU Qiong-Xiu,LIN He,YANG Liu and CHEN Qiang. Comparison of routine HLA gene typing methods[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 45(1): 424-426
Authors:CHEN Xue-Li  LUO Mei  ZHOU Qiong-Xiu  LIN He  YANG Liu  CHEN Qiang
Affiliation:Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Institute of Blood Transfusion;Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Institute of Blood Transfusion;Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Institute of Blood Transfusion;Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Institute of Blood Transfusion;Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Institute of Blood Transfusion;Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Institute of Blood Transfusion
Abstract:To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of PCR-SSP and SSO method in Sichuan bone marrow donors HLA typing. A total of 109 samples were typed by SSO and SSP.All of typing results were analyzed and compared.109 samples were correctly typed by PCR-SSO.While the ratio of wrong HLA typing by SSP method was 1.9%.Both RSSO and PCR-SSP methods can be applied in HLA typing of bone marrow donors.
Keywords:HLA typing   PCR-SSP   RSSO
点击此处可从《四川大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《四川大学学报(自然科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号