| 无单放货的法律责任竞合 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 董淳锷.无单放货的法律责任竞合[J].韶关学院学报,2004,25(1):36-38. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 董淳锷 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中山大学,法学院,广东,广州,510275 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 无单放货的法律责任性质是海商法理论和实践中争议较多的一个问题,目前主要存在“违约说”“侵权说”和“竞合说”三种观点。从提单的本质属性来看,无单放货的法律责任是违约责任和侵权责任的竞合。
|
| 关 键 词： | 无单放货 提单 法律责任竞合 中国 海商法 违约责任 侵权责任 违约说 侵权说 竞合说 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-5348(2004)01-0036-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年10月20 |
The Question of Liability Coincidence of the Delivery of Goods without Presentation of the Original Bills of Loding |
| |
| DONG Chun-e.The Question of Liability Coincidence of the Delivery of Goods without Presentation of the Original Bills of Loding[J].Journal of Shaoguan University(Social Science Edition),2004,25(1):36-38. |
| |
| Authors: | DONG Chun-e |
| |
| Abstract: | In the theory and practice of maritime law, there is much dispute over the question of the delivery of goods without presentation of the original bills of liding, especially the nature of its legal lisbility. At present there are 3 theries, which are"the theory of tort", "the theory of breach of contracts", and "the theory of liability coincidence" . From the essence of bills of loding, its legal responsibility should be the coincidence of "breach of contracts" and"tortious liability". |
| |
| Keywords: | delivery of goods without presentation of the original bills of loding bills of loding liability coincidence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
