| 地质年代术语商榷 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 潘云唐.地质年代术语商榷[J].科技术语研究,2011(1):42-44. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 潘云唐 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院研究生院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文对目前使用的一些地质年代术语提出意见和建议。如主张将Archaeozoic和Proterozoic仍译为太古代和元古代,同属于隐生宙,将隐生宙与显生宙并列;Anthropogen应译为人近纪或灵近纪;Anthropocene应译为人新世等。
|
| 关 键 词： | 太古代 元古代 隐生宙 灵近纪 人新世 |
Discussion on the Terms of Geological Age |
| |
| PAN Yuntang.Discussion on the Terms of Geological Age[J].Chinese Science and Technology Terms Journal,2011(1):42-44. |
| |
| Authors: | PAN Yuntang |
| |
| Institution: | PAN Yuntang |
| |
| Abstract: | The author put forward some views on the terms of geological chronology.For Archaeozoic and Proterozoic,they should be upgraded to Ion(Ionothem) and be juxtaposed with that the Phanerozoic and the Proterozoic,and still belonge to the Cryptozoon Ion(lionothem).As to the Paeaeogen and the Neogen,they should be translated respectively to Gu jin jiand Xing jin ji,and the Anthropocene must be translated to Ren jin ji or Ling jin ji,but not Ren nei jior Ling sheng ji.Because the terms of epochs within the Cenozoi... |
| |
| Keywords: | Archaozoic Ion Proterozoic Ion Cryptozoon Ion Anthropogen Anthropocene |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
