Bringing tacit knowledge back to contributory and interactional expertise: A reply to Goddiksen |
| |
| Authors: | Luis I Reyes-Galindo Tiago Ribeiro Duarte |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Cardiff University, School of Social Sciences, Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3WT Wales, United Kingdom;2. University of Brasília, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro/UnB, Instituto de Ciências Sociais – Departamento de Sociologia, Brasília/DF 70910-900, Brazil;1. Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, London University, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU, UK;2. Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, Faculty of Philosophy, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain |
| |
| Abstract: | We analyse a recent paper by Goddiksen (2014) where the author raises questions about the relationship between authorship, attribution and Collins & Evans' concept of contributory and interactional expertise. We then highlight recent empirical work in the sociology of climate change science that has made similar points in order to clarify how authorship, division of labour and contribution are handled in real scientific settings. Despite this, Goddiksen's critique of both contributory and interactional expertise is ultimately ineffective because it rests on a misguided attempt to de-socialise these concepts. We conclude by stressing the importance of collective tacit knowledge acquisition through immersion as a critical step in becoming a full-blown contributory or interactional expert. |
| |
| Keywords: | Interactional expertise Contributory expertise Tacit knowledge Enculturation Immersion |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
