首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

用文献计量数据解读中国和印度的科技发展
作者姓名:Ronald N. Kostoff  Michael B. Briggs  Robert L. Rushenberg  Christine A. Bowles  Sujit Bhattacharya  Dustin Johnson  Alan S. Icenhour  Kimberly Nikodym  Ryan B. Barth  Simha Dodbele  Michael Pecht
作者单位:1 Office of Naval Research, 875 N. Randolph St., Arlington, VA 22217, USA.
2 Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory, 3255 Meyers Ave, Quantico, VA 22134, USA.
3 DDL-OMNI Engineering, LLC, 8260 Greensboro Drive, McLean, VA 22102, USA.
4 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Pusa Gate, K.S.Krishnan Marg, New Delhi-110012, India.
5 University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
摘    要:该文采用SCI/SSCI数据库,对通信联系人中至少含有一位印度/中国人的科技论文进行了文献
计量学和计算语言学分析。依据对印度和中国科技文献单独分析的结果,深入地探讨了两国在科技领域
的差异。借助不同的分析技术,包括影响因子分析、相关性图解以及文档聚类(传统聚类和模糊聚类),
多角度地分析了中国和印度科技文献的基本学科结构体系(主要作者、研究单位等)与主要学科结构(学
科重点以及学科重点之间的关系)。第一部分内容介绍了中国科技文献评估,第二部分阐述了印度科技文
献评估,第三部分则为印度和中国科研成果的多角度比较。

关 键 词:中国  印度  科学技术  研究评价  研究评估  技术评估  文本挖掘  文献计量学  计算语言学  文档聚类  因子分析  相关图  核心竞争力

An Overview of China’s and India’s Science and Technology Literature
Ronald N. Kostoff,Michael B. Briggs,Robert L. Rushenberg,Christine A. Bowles,Sujit Bhattacharya,Dustin Johnson,Alan S. Icenhour,Kimberly Nikodym,Ryan B. Barth,Simha Dodbele,Michael Pecht.An Overview of China’s and India’s Science and Technology Literature[J].Science Focus,2007,2(4):1-06.
Institution:1 Office of Naval Research, 875 N. Randolph St., Arlington, VA 22217, USA.
2 Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory, 3255 Meyers Ave, Quantico, VA 22134, USA.
3 DDL-OMNI Engineering, LLC, 8260 Greensboro Drive, McLean, VA 22102, USA.
4 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Pusa Gate, K.S.Krishnan Marg, New Delhi-110012, India.
5 University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Abstract:The science and technology (S&T) literatures of India and China were analyzed individually,
then compared. Records having at least one author with an India or China address were retrieved from the
Science Citation Index/ Social Science Citation Index databases. Bibliometrics and computational linguistics
analyses were performed on these retrieved records to generate the technical infrastructure (key authors, Centers
of Excellence, etc) and technical structure (pervasive technical thrusts, relationships among thrusts) of the
Chinese and Indian S&T literatures, and to compare these literatures. A variety of analytical techniques were
used to examine the infrastructure and technical structure from multiple perspectives, including factor analysis,
correlation mapping, and document clustering (both traditional and fuzzy). The summary results and conclusions
from these studies were described. The first section of the paper presented an assessment of China’s S&T
literature; the second section presented an assessment of India’s S&T literature; and the third section compared
India’s and China’s research outputs from multiple perspectives.
Keywords:China  India  science and technology  research evaluation  research assessment  technology assessment  text Mining  bibliometrics  computational linguistics  document clustering  factor analysis  correlation mapping  core competency
点击此处可从《科学观察》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科学观察》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号