排序方式: 共有23条查询结果,搜索用时 548 毫秒
1.
钢筋混凝土有限元分析中Darwin模型下的徐变计算 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
汪基伟 《河海大学学报(自然科学版)》1998,26(4):40-44
在现有徐主计算方法的基础上,提出了适用于Darwin模型的徐变计算方法。给出了混凝土未开裂和开裂时的徐变计算公式。实际工程算例表明,本文提出的方法是合理的。 相似文献
2.
Derek Partridge 《Journal of Natural History》2016,50(15-16):1035-1044
Evidence from the Linnean Society’s ledger of papers received in 1858 points to 1 July as the date of submission of the Darwin–Wallace papers for the famous meeting of the same evening. It has been widely assumed, and repeatedly stated, that the submission was on 30 June. but this article shows that this seems to be a wrong assumption. Acceptance of this later submission date also provides an explanation of the ‘oddities’ in the letter of transmittal. In turn, this reading implies further details about the separate roles of Hooker and Lyell in the crucial 13 days before the meeting. 相似文献
3.
《Journal of Natural History》2012,46(37-38):2355-2362
Diagnostic characters are presented for Appias nero corazonae, a pierid butterfly from the Sulu Archipelago, Philippines, that exhibits female-limited polymorphism. The potential significance of A. n. corazonae for genetic investigations into Darwinian transference, the hypothetical process whereby bright colouration first evolves in the males of a species and is later ‘transferred’ to the females, is discussed. 相似文献
4.
Diagnosing Darwin's health problems has a long history. Innumerable diagnoses have been proffered in letters, articles, and a handful of dedicated books. Diagnostic speculation has exhibited contrasting somatogenic or psychogenic preferences. Psychogenic accounts dominated mid-century but were soon challenged by somatic explanations citing specific infectious or toxic aetiologies. This tension remains, although psychogenic accounts have tended to be swamped by an array of somatogenic diagnoses championed by biomedical specialists. As a whole, this parade of diagnoses has a striking syndrome du jour quality. Successive conjectures speak of the preoccupations and diagnostic fads of their particular age. Moreover, for many participants in this diagnostic game, unconscious presentism combined with self-serving projection, turning the question of what ailed Darwin into something of a Rorschach test. Never far from the surface was a sometimes-fraught tussle over the man's reputation, animated by the moral valences of the conjectures in play. In a broader sense, this diagnostic game has shaped biographical accounts of Darwin and his career in some significant ways. 相似文献
5.
This essay examines the curious relationship between Charles Darwin and the palaeontologist William Boyd Dawkins (1837–1929). Dawkins was a beneficiary of Darwin's patronage and styled himself as a Darwinian to Darwin and the public, yet viciously attacked Darwin and his theory in anonymous reviews. This has confused historians who have misunderstood the exact nature of Dawkins's attitude towards evolution and his relationship to Darwin. The present study explains both the reasons for Dawkins's contradictory statements and his relationship with Darwin. I introduce Batesian mimicry as a conceptual framework to make sense of Dawkins's actions, suggesting that Dawkins mimicked a Darwinian persona in order to secure advancement in the world of Victorian science. Dawkins's pro-Darwinian stance, therefore, was a façade, an act of mimicry. I argue that Dawkins exploited Darwin for his patronage – which took the form of advice, support from Darwin's well-placed friends, and monetary assistance – while safely expressing his dissent from Darwinian orthodoxy in the form of anonymous reviews. This is, therefore, a case study in how scientific authority and power could be gained and maintained in Victorian science by professing allegiance to Darwin and Darwinism. 相似文献
6.
7.
李学勇 《广西民族大学学报》2005,11(3):20-26
达尔文的天择说虽在19世纪中叶才提出,却在20世纪中大放异彩.但也因为著名的孟德尔遗传原理在1900年同时为三位科学家重新发现,造成达尔文原理中许多质疑.所以在20世纪中出现了许多学者对达尔文天择说发生不同的阐释.有的人坚持达尔文的基本概念,并且加以引伸扩大.也有些更多的学者提出许多不同的补充或修正.更有些学者对天择说加以曲解,以适合他们各自的认知与目的.凡此种种演变,值得做一回顾与整理.以便展望21世纪的生技发展的方向. 相似文献
8.
华莱士与达尔文共同发现了自然选择原理并引发达尔文革命已经成为我国公众理解进化论历史的常识之一,这种理解带有辉格史色彩,在皮特.鲍勒的非达尔文革命视角下可以也值得得到重新的审视。华莱士与其他有可能成为共同发现者的生物学家一样,其思路与达尔文存在本质差异,达尔文对华莱士事件的反应主要也是出于一种学术之外的考虑。19世纪进化论的主线是斯宾塞主义而不是达尔文主义,达尔文的自然选择理论是独树一帜的,并且是早熟的,澄清这一点有助于理解国外非达尔文产业的前沿动态。 相似文献
9.
通过利用~Galerkin方法得到了周期边值问题的局部光滑解,然后在小初值的条件下对光滑解做关于时间的整体先验估计,得到了二维~Landau-Lifshitz-Darwin方程组在小初值条件下的整体光滑解. 相似文献
10.
李学勇 《广西民族大学学报》2005,(3)
达尔文的天择说虽在19世纪中叶才提出,却在20世纪中大放异彩.但也因为著名的孟德尔遗传原理在1900年同时为三位科学家重新发现,造成达尔文原理中许多质疑.所以在20世纪中出现了许多学者对达尔文天择说发生不同的阐释.有的人坚持达尔文的基本概念,并且加以引伸扩大.也有些更多的学者提出许多不同的补充或修正.更有些学者对天择说加以曲解,以适合他们各自的认知与目的.凡此种种演变,值得做一回顾与整理.以便展望21世纪的生技发展的方向. 相似文献