传统教科书与马克思主义哲学的关系

正确处理传统教科书与马克思主义哲学的关系是马克思主义哲学现代发展的关键环节．传统教科书不能完整准确地反映马克思的哲学思想，切断了实践与哲学基本问题的联系，曲解了马克思主义哲学，背离了马克思的哲学研究方向，扼杀了马克思主义哲学的实践作用．马克思主义哲学的现代发展必须首先破除对传统教科书和教科书式马克思主义哲学的固执和迷信。     

先进文化、文化创新与马克思主义哲学

马克思主义哲学与文化创新的关系主要体现在：解放思想，实事求是是文化创新的世界观和方法论的基础；辩证的否定是实现文化创新的哲学方法：善于吸取总结群众的智慧与实践经验是文化创新的源泉；做好人才工作是文化创新的重要基础。     

Philosophy of chemistry and the image of science

The philosophical analysis of chemistry has advanced at such a pace during the last dozen years that the existence of philosophy of chemistry as an autonomous discipline cannot be doubted any more. The present paper will attempt to analyse the experience of philosophy of chemistry at the, so to say, meta-level. Philosophers of chemistry have especially stressed that all sciences need not be similar to physics. They have tried to argue for chemistry as its own type of science and for a pluralistic understanding of science in general. However, when stressing the specific character of chemistry, philosophers do not always analyse the question ‘What is science?’ theoretically. It is obvious that a ‘monistic’ understanding of science should not be based simply on physics as the epitome of science, regarding it as a historical accident that physics has obtained this status. The author’s point is that the philosophical and methodological image of science should not be chosen arbitrarily; instead, it should be theoretically elaborated as an idealization (theoretical model) substantiated on the historical practice of science. It is argued that although physics has, in a sense, justifiably obtained the status of a paradigm of science, chemistry, which is not simply a physical science, but a discipline with a dual character, is also relevant for elaborating a theoretical model of science. The theoretical model of science is a good tool for examining various issues in philosophy of chemistry as well as in philosophy of science or science studies generally.     

中国传统学术视阈中的历史与历史哲学

从中国传统学术的视阈入手，梳理与辨析历史和历史哲学的内涵与外延。考察历史一词的多重含义；指出西方历史哲学乃根据对历史的两分法，即历史事实和历史著述，而有“思辨的历史哲学”和“分析的历史哲学”两大流派；进而指出中国古代对历史有一三分法，即史事、史文、史义，认为史义即为中国的历史哲学，同时史义又包含有“历史之大义”与“吾心之精义”两部分内容。     

《广西民族学院学报(哲社版)》引文分析

运用文献计量学方法 ,对 1 995～ 2 0 0 2年度《广西民族学院学报 (哲社版 )》全部论文的引文量、引文类型、引文语种、引文年代等进行统计分析 ,揭示该刊论文著者利用科技文献的规律。     

明朝前期吴与弼的兼采朱陆之学

吴与弼以一位程朱学身份，主要关注的却是心学问题。在他的心学理论中，心既是一个认识主体，又是一个伦理本体。他既认为仁义礼智本具于心中，又认为心之外存在着天命，人有时只能“一听于天”。他的修养方法偏重于“反求于心”，也注意到读书、应接事物一类下达功夫。他在坚持程朱理气学说的同时，又大量吸收陆九渊的心学。他的学说“实能兼采朱陆之长”。他的学说，通过弟子陈献章、再传弟子湛若水影响了王守仁，成为王守仁心学的源泉之一。     

从哲学反思中探析马克思主义哲学教学创新

目前,我国高校的马克思主义哲学教学中存在着大学生学习积极性不高等问题。这些问题产生的根本原因不在于马克思主义哲学本身或其教学方法,而在于教学理念的失误。我们要改变马克思主义哲学的教学现状,就必须创新和重构一种与马克思主义哲学学科相适应的新的教学理念。     

论邓小平对马克思主义社会发展观的发展

邓小平在继承马克思主义社会发展观的基础上,适应中国形势和任务的变化,及时总结经验,在社会发展模式、社会发展动力、社会发展阶段、社会发展指导思想、社会发展目标等方面创新和发展了包括毛泽东社会发展观在内的马克思主义社会发展观,促进了马克思主义社会发展理论的新发展.     

新时期思想解放语境中实事求是的哲学解读

无论在革命战争时期还是改革开放以后，实事求是思想一直是我们奉行的实践准则，并以此一步步走向胜利。但在这一过程中，也有人形而上的理解实事求是，难免导致教条与僵化，无法为实践提供正确的指导。因此，我们必须将实事求是置于新时期思想解放运动的语境中来理解，辩证的理解其与解放思想的内在联系，才能真正的把握其哲学意涵，才能充分发挥其指导思想的作用。     

Coincidence and reproducibility in the EHT black hole experiment

This paper discusses some philosophical aspects related to the recent publication of the experimental results of the 2017 black hole experiment, namely the first image of the supermassive black hole at the center of galaxy M87. In this paper I present a philosophical analysis of the 2017 Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) black hole experiment. I first present Hacking's philosophy of experimentation. Hacking gives his taxonomy of elements of laboratory science and distinguishes a list of elements. I show that the EHT experiment conforms to major elements from Hacking's list. I then describe with the help of Galison's Philosophy of the Shadow how the EHT Collaboration created the famous black hole image. Galison outlines three stages for the reconstruction of the black hole image: Socio-Epistemology, Mechanical Objectivity, after which there is an additional Socio-Epistemology stage. I subsequently present my own interpretation of the reconstruction of the black hole image and I discuss model fitting to data. I suggest that the main method used by the EHT Collaboration to assure trust in the results of the EHT experiment is what philosophers call the Argument from Coincidence. I show that using this method for the above purpose is problematic. I present two versions of the Argument from Coincidence: Hacking's Coincidence and Cartwright's Reproducibility by which I analyse the EHT experiment. The same estimation of the mass of the black hole is reproduced in four different procedures. The EHT Collaboration concludes: the value we have converged upon is robust. I analyse the mass measurements of the black hole with the help of Cartwright's notion of robustness. I show that the EHT Collaboration construe Coincidence/Reproducibility as Technological Agnosticism and I contrast this interpretation with van Fraassen's scientific agnosticism.