Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions between sociology and epistemology

The aim of the paper is to clarify Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions. We propose to discriminate between a scientific revolution, which is a sociological event of a change of attitude of the scientific community with respect to a particular theory, and an epistemic rupture, which is a linguistic fact consisting of a discontinuity in the linguistic framework in which this theory is formulated. We propose a classification of epistemic ruptures into four types. In the paper, each of these types of epistemic ruptures is illustrated by examples from physics. The classification of epistemic ruptures can be used as a basis for a classification of scientific revolutions and thus for a refinement of our view of the progress of science.     

基于SCP范式的河南省物流产业的产业组织研究

物流产业是国民经济发展的动脉和基础产业,它的发展质量和竞争力关系到其他产业的发展。文中运用SCP理论框架来研究河南省物流业的市场结构、市场行为和市场绩效,进而分析河南省物流业存在的问题,并提出相应的产业政策建议。     

Towards an Object-oriented Simulation World View

ＴｏｗａｒｄｓａｎＯｂｊｅｃｔ－ｏｒｉｅｎｔｅｄＳｉｍｕｌａｔｉｏｎＷｏｒｌｄＶｉｅｗＦＥＮＧＨｕｉｊｕｎ（ＤｅｐａｒｔｍｅｎｔｏｆＥｃｏｎｏｍｉｃＭａｎａｇｅｍｅｎｔＳｈｉｊｉａｚｈｕａｎｇＲａｉｌｗａｙＩｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅＳｈｉｊｉａｚｈｕａｎｇ，...     

科技银行中国化与科技银行范式——兼论如何发展中国的科技银行

在对"科技银行"进行广义化阐释的基础上,概括并比较研究了两类"科技银行"美国范式——硅谷银行"科技银行"范式和西部技术投资公司"科技银行"范式,3类"科技银行"中国范式——科技支行范式、科技小贷公司范式和科技债权融资平台范式。基于对"科技银行"范式的分析,提出了关于促进"科技银行"发展的4条建议。     

和谐与贯通——莱布尼茨的STS活动及启示

STS是二战前后兴起的新兴领域和学科,其根本特征是科学、技术、社会三者相互渗透所形成的复合性超学科理念。而这早在莱布尼茨的科学活动中就有许多体现。莱布尼茨的STS活动可以分为理论和实践二个方面。在理论活动方面,他坚持整体的科学理念,开展跨界性的学术研究和对科学的人文性理解;在STS实践方面,他通过建立广泛的学术联系以及推动学术共同体的建设来开展科学、技术与社会的综合活动。这既有个体思想与立场、治学特点和风格的原因,也有研究范式和非学院化的社会身份的原因。由于莱布尼茨的手稿在生前大部分没有公布,结果导致了罗素所说的隐显两个"莱布尼茨"的存在。今天,研究莱布尼茨既要去挖掘和"发现",又要去推动和实践他的理想。     

对土木工程专业应用型本科人才培养模式的探索

根据土木工程专业应用型本科人才的特点,坚持"厚基础,宽口径、重实践,强能力"的办学理念,以课程建设与学生创新能力建设为突破口,进一步深化人才培养模式与教学方法改革,从人才培养的层次定位,创新意识的训练,职业素质的培养,双师型教师培养,实践能力的强化等方面探索土木工程应用型本科人才培养模式。     

The emergence of objectivity: Fleck,Foucault, Kuhn and Hacking

The analytical notions of ‘thought style’, ‘paradigm’, ‘episteme’ and ‘style of reasoning’ are some of the most popular frameworks in the history and philosophy of science. Although their proponents, Ludwik Fleck, Thomas Kuhn, Michel Foucault, and Ian Hacking, are all part of the same philosophical tradition that closely connects history and philosophy, the extent to which they share similar assumptions and objectives is still under debate. In the first part of the paper, I shall argue that, despite the fact that these four thinkers disagree on certain assumptions, their frameworks have the same explanatory goal – to understand how objectivity is possible. I shall present this goal as a necessary element of a common project -- that of historicising Kant's a priori. In the second part of the paper, I shall make an instrumental use of the insights of these four thinkers to form a new model for studying objectivity. I shall also propose a layered diagram that allows the differences between the frameworks to be mapped, while acknowledging their similarities. This diagram will show that the frameworks of style of reasoning and episteme illuminate conditions of possibility that lie at a deeper level than those considered by thought styles and paradigms.     

运用范式理论研究语文阅读教学转型的意义

语文新课程标准中的阅读对话教学理念融合了建构主义课程观、接受美学理论、解释学、对话理论等多种理论,以范式理论的整合思维来考察语文阅读教学的转型有利于进一步探索新的教学思路,从根本上推进语文阅读教学的改革。     

中介语可变性研究的两个社会心理模式

介绍中介语研究的两个社会心理模式,即拉波夫模式和言语调节理论。大多数中介语的体变化研究是在拉波夫模式的理论框架内进行的,即根据学习对语言形式的注意程度来研究中介语的体变化。言语调节理论根据说话人在交谈时对听话人的社会、教育及种族状况的态度来解释中介语的变化。     

‘Working in a new world’: Kuhn,constructivism, and mind-dependence

In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn famously advanced the claim that scientists work in a different world after a scientific revolution. Kuhn's view has been at the center of a philosophical literature that has tried to make sense of his bold claim, by listing Kuhn's view in good company with other seemingly constructivist proposals. The purpose of this paper is to take some steps towards clarifying what sort of constructivism (if any) is in fact at stake in Kuhn's view. To this end, I distinguish between two main (albeit not exclusive) notions of mind-dependence: a semantic notion and an ontological one. I point out that Kuhn's view should be understood as subscribing to a form of semantic mind-dependence, and conclude that semantic mind-dependence does not land us into any worrisome ontological mind-dependence, pace any constructivist reading of Kuhn.