What if We were Already in the In-Between? Further Ventures into the Ontologies of Science and Politics

What follows from the suggestion to pay attention to what is in-between science and politics? Karen François’s paper “In-between science and politics” follows Latour in arguing for the need for political theory to get out of the Platonic cave that it still inhabits. Political theory needs to be brought into the wild through empirical studies of how science and politics in fact intermix. And the Latourian proposition needs to be strengthened by focusing on the embodied knowledges that enable situated objectivities to emerge. Though worthwhile, these arguments are weakened by a superficial treatment of political theory and by a lack of attention to the difficulties involved in combining Latourian actor-network theory with the “strong objectivity” of standpoint theory. Most problematically the paper purports to define as an agenda (exploring the in-between of science and politics) what whole fields of inquiry have already been in full swing exploring for quite a while. The ‘turn to ontology’ in STS and social anthropology and the development of ‘empirical philosophy’ suggests what might be at stake in such explorations.     

Sympathectomy enhances the substance P-mediated breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier in response to infrared irradiation of the rabbit iris

Rabbits were subjected to infrared irradiation of the iris 1 month after unilateral cervical sympathectomy. The resulting breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier was greatly enhanced on the sympathectomized side. In contrast, the response to intravitreally injected substance P (SP) was the same in both eyes. The enhancement of the response to IR irradiation could be abolished by pretreatment with an SP antagonist, (D-Pro2, D-Trp7,9)-SP.     

Sympathectomy enhances the substance P-mediated breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier in response to infrared irradiation of the rabbit iris

Summary Rabbits were subjected to infrared irradiation of the iris 1 month after unilateral cervical sympathectomy. The resulting breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier was greatly enhanced on the sympathectomized side. In contrast, the response to intravitreally injected substance P (SP) was the same in both eyes. The enhancement of the response to IR irradiation could be abolished by pretreatment with an SP antagonist, (D-Pro², D-Trp^7,9)-SP.This study was supported by grants from the Swedish MRC (04X-1007, 14X-2321), the Medical Faculty of Lund, Ferring Arzneimitel, Kiel (Federal Republic of Germany) and Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Malmö (Sweden).