关于近代物理实验教学的思考

本文从教学模式、教学方法、开放实验、专题讲座几方面提出了关于提高近代物理实验教学质量的一些设想。     

一阶线性非齐次微分方程求解方法的讨论和一个简化的求解方法

本文证明了一阶线性非齐次微分方程y＇+P(x)·y=f(x)三个求解方法:参数变易法、积分公式、积分因子法之间的等同关系.从参数变易法中引出一个简化的积分公式.事实上此公式恰是对用参数变易法解高阶线性非齐次微分方程时对n=1的拓广.最后以实例验证此公式的简易.     

民族工作缺失与民族工作过度——城市化进程中需要关注的若干民族问题

从长期工作和实践的角度出发,阐述了当前都市民族工作中存在的现实问题,提出了“民族工作的缺失”和“民族工作的过度”等概念。     

酒名的结构模式和用字情况

酒名有商标、分商标、特殊质料、扩展、功能、适用场合(或对象)、类型等7个主要结构成分,11种结构模式。酒名对11种模式的利用不是均等的,模式5、模式6和模式7是基本结构模式。酒名的用字特点突出,国俗词语、地名、人名、文化典籍等常用来命名酒名。     

建构全纳教育理念下的汉语言文学专业的课程体系

全纳教育是21世纪国际教育的新思潮,体现国际教育的发展趋势和理想境界。借鉴全纳教育的人权观、平等观、民主观、学习观、课程教学观等先进教育理念,构建汉语言文学专业的新的课程体系,有利于学生的个性发展与未来的可持续性发展。     

The Frontier Movement and The American Values and Beliefs

This paper briefly accounts the background of American values and beliefs. It analyses the essence of the American ideals and points out that the American values are exaggerated and glamorized by the American upper class. They are in a sense, a dose of anaesthetic and a kind of hypocrisy.     

The Response of Debris-Flow Events to Solar Proton Flares （Ⅰ）

By analyzing the observation data from Dongchuan Debris Flow Observation and Research Station and historical data from year 1965 to 1990 gotten from National Astronomical Ob-servatories/Yunnan Observatory,the responding of debris flow in Jiangjia Ravine to Solar Proton Flare is studied. The following conclusion can be drawn. Solar Proton Flare,as one of most im-portant astronomical factors,affects the activity of debris flow in Yunnan. Generally,from 1965 to1990,the more active Solar Pro-ton Flare is,the greater the probability of high frequency and large runoff of debris flow is. On the contrary,the less active Solar Pro-ton Flare is,the greater the probability of low frequency,small runoff,and low sediment transport of debris flow is.     

对优秀跳远运动员助跑准确性的研究

通过对全国第十届运动会37名男女跳远运动员比赛的调查和分析,研究表明：第一，运动员的前三轮试跳助跑准确性、稳定性较好，而在后三轮试跳助跑准确性、稳定性较差，极大地影响了他们正常水平的发挥．第二，心理因素对跳远助跑的准确性有较大的影响,建议在今后的训练中加强在特殊状态下助跑技术稳定性的训练．     

背诵——基于模因论的英语输入策略

阐述了当前大学英语教学中语言输入不足之现状,提出了以模因论为理论基础的背诵输入策略,指出将背诵输入策略运用于英语教学的重大意义。     

Picturing the moon: Hevelius’s and Riccioli’s visual debate

This article investigates the maps of the moon produced in the mid-seventeenth century by Jesuit Giambattista Riccioli (1598-1671) and Johannes Hevelius (1611-1687), whose cartographic projects competed for widespread acceptance. Although Hevelius’s Selenographia (1647) was applauded for its many detailed, self-engraved pictures of the moon, his cartography and proposed nomenclature were supplanted by Riccioli’s as offered in Almagestum novum (1651), in spite of the latter’s simplistic pictures and promotion of geocentric cosmology. Exploring this paradox through pictorial analysis, three types of images common to both Selenographia and Almagestum novum are compared, employing an analytical tool developed by Svetlana Alpers in The art of describing (1983). A focus on this debate exposes the tensions evoked by new technologies of vision and competing cultures of visual epistemology in seventeenth-century astronomy. As both selenographers grappled with questions about the role of representation and what kinds of knowledge could be generated visually, the successes and failures of their competing projects present implications for the course of visual astronomy, as well as for our understanding of the use of ‘visual technologies’ in a period of controversy.