图书馆在临床循证医学中的作用

循证医学逐渐改变着医疗的方式,它将系统独立的研究依据引入医疗实践。于是,医学图书馆学或医学信息学天然地成了循证医学的一个研究领域,并扩大了医学图书馆的工作范围。以循证医学证据系统工作的网络信息性质为背景,探讨了医学图书馆在循证医学中的作用。     

D-S证据理论在组合导航中的决策判断

在组合导航融合算法中引入证据理论对导航信息进行决策应用,推导出2个传感器信息融合后的结论,并且通过仿真实验得出计算结果。证据理论判断公式在处理具有证据冲突的相关信息时引入不确定熵的概念。证据理论算法通过不确定熵在加权合成算法和乘权合成算法之间作适度的折中判断。这种改进的证据理论方法可以分析组合导航信息融合算法中存在的问题,并给出最后的决策执行命令。     

用模糊测量和D-S证据论模拟学生的知识水平

本文以“智能型数学分析ＣＡＩ”项目作为实验基础,研究了ＩＣＡＩ系统中的瓶颈：建模学生,评估学生当前知识水平这一难题。     

Standards of evidence and causality in regulatory science: Risk and benefit assessment

In this paper we analyze the Russo-Williamson Thesis (RWT) as a standard of evidence in regulatory science, in risk as well as benefit assessment. In our analysis we take account of the recent controversies that have taken place in regulation with respect to the evidentiary requirements necessary for regulatory decision making. RWT's main point is that not only probabilistic but also mechanistic evidence is necessary for being able to infer the existence of causal links. We ask in which way RWT could have an impact upon current decision making about subjecting to regulation (or, to the contrary, leaving them unregulated) certain chemical substances, food stuffs, health claims, and other typical objects of regulation. We show that the application of RWT resolves some of the problems posed by current standards of evidence. RWT makes it possible to determine with higher accuracy if a particular substance should be subjected to regulation or not, even though under certain circumstances RWT itself may turn into a source of regulatory error. The adequacy of RWT as a standard of evidence depends on the precise manner of its application to regulation (particularly the consideration of mechanistic evidence as a complementary or necessary requirement), as well as the assessment of its non-epistemic consequences.     

What is mechanistic evidence,and why do we need it for evidence-based policy?

It has recently been argued that successful evidence-based policy should rely on two kinds of evidence: statistical and mechanistic. The former is held to be evidence that a policy brings about the desired outcome, and the latter concerns how it does so. Although agreeing with the spirit of this proposal, we argue that the underlying conception of mechanistic evidence as evidence that is different in kind from correlational, difference-making or statistical evidence, does not correctly capture the role that information about mechanisms should play in evidence-based policy. We offer an alternative account of mechanistic evidence as information concerning the causal pathway connecting the policy intervention to its outcome. Not only can this be analyzed as evidence of difference-making, it is also to be found at any level and is obtainable by a broad range of methods, both experimental and observational. Using behavioral policy as an illustration, we draw the implications of this revised understanding of mechanistic evidence for debates concerning policy extrapolation, evidence hierarchies, and evidence integration.     

基于维权执法任务的单警执法系统

当前警察在执法取证过程中取证手段单一,不能实时、有效地对证据进行分析处理,不能为执法任务的侦查、抓捕等行动提供有效辅助支撑。为解决此类问题,构建了一种以多警员协同取证为主、单警员取证为辅的体系化单警执法系统。采用网络体系架构,集成先进取证设备、传输设备,应用基于深度学习算法的证据处理系统,并采用系统工程的方法,对该系统进行总体和运行流程设计,在设计过程中提出了信息集成、指挥辅助决策、特征提取等关键技术。     

浅论刑法中"非法占有目的的产生时间"

区别于非法占有目的的传统研究,另立视角,就非法占有目的产生时间的涵义、理论价值、实践意义及其认定等问题作了研讨。非法占有目的的产生时间问题,是深入研究非法占有目的、合理解决定罪量刑需要提出并加以系统研究的新课题,应引起重视。     

《汉语大字典》书证晚出举隅

书证晚出，历史词典应该避免，同《雨雅》对照，《汉语大字典》晚出书证近2000条，短则数百年，长则千多年，本文从11种词典中列举88例，可供《汉语大字典》修改时选择入典参考，尤有49例，同《雨雅》一字不差，《汉语大字典》弃《雨雅》不同，令人不解。     

析民事诉讼举证责任的三层涵义

民事诉讼举证责任包括不可分割的三层涵义，即提供证据的责任、证明主张的责任和败诉的风险责任。举证责任的三层涵义在民事诉讼庭审过程中都有表现，它贯穿于法庭审理的全过程，成为民事诉讼证据的核心。     

论证据的概念和特征

证据首先是一种客观事物;证据又是一种认识要求和认识标准,它与人的思维能力和思维目的保持一致;诉讼中的证据又是一个法律的范畴,体现在诉讼程序中的证据是一个能在不同层面上体现不同意义的综合体,具有自己独有的特征。