大学生变态心理与心理保键初探

通过对校大学生变态心理的各种特征、病因的探讨，提出研究大学生的变态心理，加强和完善大学校内的心理保健措施，对大学生的身心健康与成才有着积极的意义。     

知识论批判:一种教育哲学的反思

知识论不仅是近代哲学的中心问题,也是近现代教育的精神基础。知识论是近现代教育的理论,近现代教育则是知识论的实践。知识论的知性思维方式对近现代教育产生了弥散性影响,而教育世界的知识论化在本质上却是一种价值颠覆,即科学知识取得了对其他知识类型的优先性。知识论放逐了本真的心灵问题,这是近现代教育问题之根源。从教育哲学的角度反思与批判知识论,是对知识论批判的必要补充。     

浅谈高校体育教学与大学生心理健康

当前,大学生面临着较大的压力,由此引发的心理健康问题日益明显。本文分析了大学生心理健康状况并探析其原因,结合体育教学对大学生心理健康的影响,提出了高校体育教学促进学生心理健康发展的途径。     

马克思异化劳动理论视域下的技术哲学思想

从异化劳动理论出发,一方面,马克思将工业与技术视为人的类本质,视为人的本质力量的公开展示;另一方面,他又认为在一定历史条件下,作为类本质的技术-工业可能产生异化。他以人本主义的理想劳动来关照现实的工人异化劳动的生存状态,将工人异化劳动的生存状态与造成异化的社会结构和经济结构联系起来,形成了对资本主义私有财产的批判。在异化劳动理论的基础上,马克思的研究视域实现了向经济学哲学的转变,其技术哲学思想得以建立。     

黑格尔的世界历史观——《历史哲学》绪论解读

黑格尔的“世界历史”概念既不同于“普遍的人类历史”又不同于一般历史学的“世界通史”。黑格尔“世界历史”概念的特定内涵集中于《历史哲学》的绪论部分。黑格尔认为,世界历史是一种合理的过程,其合理性体现在精神自身发展的辩证历程之中。因为精神自身的发展是一个辩证的过程,所以现实的世界历史行程也是一个辩证的过程。这一思想成为了马克思世界历史理论的重要源头。     

《〈黑格尔法哲学批判〉导言》自由意蕴探析

在《〈黑格尔法哲学批判〉导言》中,马克思以“解放”诠释“自由”,指出真正的自由是关乎全体人类的“普遍解放”。在马克思看来,以往的宗教批判和改革所取得的“中世纪的部分胜利”与当时思辨哲学所取得的纯粹精神自由都是不彻底的。实现真正的自由需要进行“彻底的革命”,既需要对一切不彻底的批判进行再批判,更需要在实践中彻底变革落后的现实。批判的根本在于彻底否定宗教与思辨哲学所塑造的乌托邦式的自由,实践的根本在于彻底消灭私有制。     

近年来国内政治学理论若干热点问题研究述略

近年来在实践的推动下，和谐社会的政治学解读，政治哲学研究，协商民主研究和政治学学科理论、方法研究等，成为国内政治学研究的热点问题，有大量成果问世。对此基本情况作简单回顾和分析，以推动理论研究走向深入。进一步指导实践。     

Does environmental science crowd out non-epistemic values?

While no one denies that science depends on epistemic values, many philosophers of science have wrestled with the appropriate role of non-epistemic values, such as social, ethical, and political values. Recently, philosophers of science have overwhelmingly accepted that non-epistemic values should play a legitimate role in science. The recent philosophical debate has shifted from the value-free ideal in science to questions about how science should incorporate non-epistemic values. This article engages with such questions through an exploration of the environmental sciences. These sciences are a mosaic of diverse fields characterized by interdisciplinarity, problem-orientation, policy-directedness, and ubiquitous non-epistemic values. This article addresses a frequently voiced concern about many environmental science practices: that they ‘crowd out’ or displace significant non-epistemic values by either (1) entailing some non-epistemic values, rather than others, or by (2) obscuring discussion of non-epistemic values altogether. With three detailed case studies – monetizing nature, nature-society dualism, and ecosystem health – we show that the alleged problem of crowding out emerges from active debates within the environmental sciences. In each case, critics charge that the scientific practice in question displaces non-epistemic values in at least one of the two senses distinguished above. We show that crowding out is neither necessary nor always harmful when it occurs. However, we do see these putative objections to the application of environmental science as teaching valuable lessons about what matters for successful environmental science, all things considered. Given the significant role that many environmental scientists see for non-epistemic values in their fields, we argue that these cases motivate lessons about the importance of value-flexibility (that practices can accommodate a plurality of non-epistemic values), transparency about value-based decisions that inform practice, and environmental pragmatism.     

Growing knowledge: Epistemic objects in agricultural extension work

We introduce a novel form of experimental knowledge that is the result of institutionally structured communication practices between farmers and university- and local community-based agronomists (agricultural extension specialists). This form of knowledge is exemplified in these communities’ uses of the concept of grower standard. Grower standard is a widely used but seldom discussed benchmark concept underpinning protocols used within agricultural experiments. It is not a one-size-fits-all standard but the product of local and active interactions between farmers and agricultural extension specialists. Grower standard is in some ways similar to more familiar epistemic objects discussed in philosophy of experiment, such as controls or background conditions. However, we argue that grower standard is epistemically novel, due to how knowledge arising from it is coproduced by farmers and agricultural extension specialists. Further, in the United States, this knowledge coproduction is institutionally structured by federal legislature dating back to the 19th century. We use our analysis of grower standard to focus a discussion of the positionality of the coproducers as well as the epistemic products of this form of knowledge coproduction, and we explore the role extension work plays in shaping agricultural science more broadly.     

浅谈大学生心理健康的培养

高校是培养人才的摇篮,大学阶段是大学生个性形成的关键时期。本文就大学生心理健康现状进行了调查、分析,并就如何有效地促进大学生心理健康作了一定的尝试。