浅析热门电影《泰囧》中不合作的幽默

热门电影《泰礮》包含有丰富的幽默语料。从语用学的角度,结合电影中的幽默对白实例,探讨人物在会话中因违反合作原则的四个准则而产生的幽默效果,将有助于我们更好地理解和掌握语言,提高鉴赏和运用语言的能力。     

援形写神穷理味道--论两宋写实画风

两宋时形成的以刻画精微、形神兼备为尚的鲜明画风,把中国美术史上的写实性绘画推向极致,耸立起以写实为追求的时代丰碑。它的形成是前代写实性理论和艺术实践的厚积,同时也与特定历史境遇中时人对万物之理的孜孜追求无不关联。这种写实性画风形成与嬗变的过程,也正是画者打通物我之分,对自然规律和外物精神的感悟和表述。     

围绕高职人才培养目标,构建教学质量保障体系

该文提出围绕高职人才培养目标,以高职教育教学质量观为理念构建教学质量保障体系;并全面阐述了高职教学质量保障体系的结构内容和特征。     

Weinberg's proof of the spin-statistics theorem

The aim of this paper is to offer a conceptual analysis of Weinberg's proof of the spin-statistics theorem by comparing it with Pauli's original proof and with the subsequent textbook tradition, which typically resorts to the dichotomy positive energy for half-integral spin particles/microcausality for integral-spin particles. In contrast to this tradition, Weinberg's proof does not directly invoke the positivity of the energy, but derives the theorem from the single relativistic requirement of microcausality. This seemingly innocuous difference marks an important change in the conceptual basis of quantum physics. Its historical, theoretical, and conceptual roots are here reconstructed. The link between Weinberg's proof and Pauli's original is highlighted: Weinberg's proof turns out to do justice to Pauli's anti-Dirac lines of thought. The work of Furry and Oppenheimer is also surveyed as a “third way” between the textbook tradition established by Pauli and Weinberg's approach.     

近代天体物理学中的毕达哥拉斯主义倾向

在科学哲学中,毕达哥拉斯主义的要旨是认为物理世界的奥秘在于数学和谐或基本对称性。本文通过近代天体物理学发展史的考察表明,这一思想不仅对行星运动定律的发现有决定性意义,而且对宇宙模型的建构和近代天体力学体系的建立都有启示价值。     

市场能量释放机理与影响场的影响模式

市场变化经常出人意料，已有的分析市场、激励市场和预测市场的方法和手段，常常对此还无能为力。本文在定义市场能量和市场能量释放概念的基础上，构建了由影响场系统、心理介质系统和市场能量系统组成的市场能量释放系统，并引入“场”的概念描述影响因素对市场能量系统的作用机理，根据系统理论分析了影响场系统的结构关系，研究各影响场相互关系的影响模式，从而为把握市场变化规律提供理论和方法支持。     

全面理解中国特色的社会主义政治文明

党的十六大报告把发展社会主义民主政治，建设社会主义政治文明，确定为全面建设小康社会的重要目标。本文就其中所蕴含的辩证性、民主性、原则性及时代性等方面进行了全面的论述。旨在理解中国特色社会主义政治文明的深刻内涵，为我们在全面建设小康社会。开创中国特色社会主义事业的实践中，指明前进的方向和奋斗的目标。     

研究生管理信息系统的设计与实施

本文探讨了研究生管理信息系统的设计原则,提出实施研究生管理信息系统的具体方案,对系统关键技术作了说明,并简要概述对系统所具有的特性。     

Mechanisms, principles, and Lorentz's cautious realism

I show that Albert Einstein's distinction between principle and constructive theories was predated by Hendrik A. Lorentz's equivalent distinction between mechanism- and principle-theories. I further argue that Lorentz's views toward realism similarly prefigure what Arthur Fine identified as Einstein's “motivational realism.”     

Symmetry, asymmetry, and the real possibility of radical change: reply to Kochan

In his critique of my book Heidegger and Marcuse, Jeff Kochan (2006) asserts that I am committed to the possibility of private knowledge, transcendent truths, and individualism. In this reply I argue that he has misinterpreted my analysis of the Challenger disaster and Marcuse’s work. Because I do not dismiss Roger Boisjoly’s doubts about the Challenger launch, Kochan believes that I have abandoned a social concept of knowledge for a reliance on the private knowledge of a single individual. In fact, I consider Boisjoly’s observations just as social, if not as scientific, as the results of rigorous scientific study. Kochan’s reliance on a principle of symmetry derived from science studies to explain such politically charged technological controversies tends to mask the role of power and ideology in social life. Kochan interprets Marcuse as a failed Heideggerian who regresses from Heidegger’s social conception of human being to traditional individualism. I am accused of sharing this view. This interpretation overlooks the importance of the Hegelian–Marxist category of ‘real possibility’ in Marcuse’s work and so mistakes his critique of conformist politics for individualist romanticism. Marcuse always attempted to ground radical opposition in a community of struggle without abandoning the heritage of a long critical tradition. This view I willingly share.