普通生物学课程互动拓展式教学方法改革探索

普通生物学作为生物学相关专业的基础课,涵盖了诸多生命科学领域,旨在帮助学生了解生命科学全貌,打下坚实基础.然而在教学实际中,课程内容广泛且松散,部分知识点高中生物已涉猎,传统"填鸭式"教学无法提升低年级学生的学习兴趣,以致影响对该课程甚至后续其他专业课程的学习.为了解决这些问题,采用互动拓展式教学对"普通生物学"课程进行了改革尝试,引入BBC科学纪录片、诺贝尔奖案例和科学动画等辅助知识点教学,增加翻转课堂、微课视频、第二实践课堂等互动和拓展方式来丰富课堂教学.改革实践表明,互动拓展式教学方法能够提升学生兴趣并且培养学生思维,为后续其他专业课程的学习以及高素质生物学人才的培养打下坚实基础.     

非线性时滞微分方程组周期解存在的一个充分条件

考虑非线性时滞微分方程组周期解的存在性问题,应用Leray-Schauder不动点定理,证明了非线性微分方程组周期解新的存在性结果.     

Fantastic Beasts and where (not) to find them: Local gravitational energy and energy conservation in general relativity

This paper critically examines energy-momentum conservation and local (differential) notions of gravitational energy in General Relativity (GR). On the one hand, I argue that energy-momentum of matter is indeed locally (differentially) conserved: Physical matter energy-momentum 4-currents possess no genuine sinks/sources. On the other hand, global (integral) energy-momentum conservation is contingent on spacetime symmetries. Local gravitational energy-momentum is found to be a supererogatory notion. Various explicit proposals for local gravitational energy-momentum are investigated and found wanting. Besides pseudotensors, the proposals considered include those of Lorentz and Levi-Civita, Pitts and Baker. It is concluded that the ontological commitment we ought to have towards gravitational energy in GR mimics the natural anti-realism/eliminativism towards apparent forces in Newtonian Mechanics.     

普通物理双语教学模型探索

本文阐明了对普通物理实施双语教学的重要性。对普通物理双语教学过程中各个环节进行了探索和实践,期望进一步推进我院双语教学的步伐和改善双语教学模式。     

大型二维装箱问题及其禁忌算法研究

对大型二维装箱问题进行描述,提出求解该问题的禁忌算法.算法基于自然数编码,设计了货物的摆放规则和序列生成方式,采用二种邻域,根据邻域的不同,构造了两种禁忌表.算法采用惩罚函‘数处理空间利用率约束.介绍算法的原理,给出了具有代表性算例试验结果并且进行了分析.试验结果表明了提出的禁忌算法对优化大型二维装箱问题的有效性.     

我国生猪补贴政策及其效用研究

探讨自2007年下半年政府出台一系列生猪补贴政策以来,补贴政策实施的有效性以及如何合理制定补贴政策。     

一类可微非线性系统全维观测器设计

对一类可微Lipschitz非线性系统的全维观测器设计的探究.主要借助拟单边Lipschitz条件给出对一类可微非线性系统全维观测器的设计方法.并给出仿真算例.     

一类奇异微分方程边值问题的数值方法

在再生核空间中讨论一类二阶奇异微分方程两点边值问题.研究方程解存在的充分性和解唯一的必要性,建立解的精确表达式,获得近似解的求解方法,数值模拟结果说明该方法的有效性.     

Coincidence and reproducibility in the EHT black hole experiment

This paper discusses some philosophical aspects related to the recent publication of the experimental results of the 2017 black hole experiment, namely the first image of the supermassive black hole at the center of galaxy M87. In this paper I present a philosophical analysis of the 2017 Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) black hole experiment. I first present Hacking's philosophy of experimentation. Hacking gives his taxonomy of elements of laboratory science and distinguishes a list of elements. I show that the EHT experiment conforms to major elements from Hacking's list. I then describe with the help of Galison's Philosophy of the Shadow how the EHT Collaboration created the famous black hole image. Galison outlines three stages for the reconstruction of the black hole image: Socio-Epistemology, Mechanical Objectivity, after which there is an additional Socio-Epistemology stage. I subsequently present my own interpretation of the reconstruction of the black hole image and I discuss model fitting to data. I suggest that the main method used by the EHT Collaboration to assure trust in the results of the EHT experiment is what philosophers call the Argument from Coincidence. I show that using this method for the above purpose is problematic. I present two versions of the Argument from Coincidence: Hacking's Coincidence and Cartwright's Reproducibility by which I analyse the EHT experiment. The same estimation of the mass of the black hole is reproduced in four different procedures. The EHT Collaboration concludes: the value we have converged upon is robust. I analyse the mass measurements of the black hole with the help of Cartwright's notion of robustness. I show that the EHT Collaboration construe Coincidence/Reproducibility as Technological Agnosticism and I contrast this interpretation with van Fraassen's scientific agnosticism.     

Interpreting cosmic no hair theorems: Is fatalism about the far future of expanding cosmological models unavoidable?

It may be tempting to interpret cosmic no hair theorems (establishing that, under certain conditions, a cosmological model with accelerating expansion approaches de Sitter metric in the future) as implying a form of fatalism about a future state of the universe. In this note I explore (rather general) philosophical and (more concrete) physical reasons to resist such temptation. There are good reasons to think that (even locally) futures of expanding cosmological models may be unlike de Sitter.