气垫带式输送机气膜厚度的计算

在气垫带式输送机的输送带和盘槽之间能否形成一层均匀稳定的气膜并使气膜的厚度达到最佳值,对输送机的能耗和性能有着直接的影响.本文着重介绍一种计算气膜厚度的方法,可为气垫带式输送机的设计提供可靠的依据.     

悲剧人生的人性之光——艾·巴·辛格的《洗衣妇》解读

诺贝尔文学奖获得者艾·巴·辛格以编故事见长.在故事中透过"小人物"的遭遇,表现出底层人民生活的沉重.<洗衣妇>中的老妇人,在自尊、诚实、充满责任感的悲惨命运中折射出了人性之光.同时,作者的创作才华在作品的简短中得到充分彰显.     

一类竞赛试题的统一解法

本文主要利用Cauchy不等式的取等条件对一类特殊方程组的求解问题提出了一种新的解法,并与传统解法进行对比,突出其优越性。     

牛顿引力平方反比定律的证明

该文提示了牛顿有关引力平方反比定律证明了演化过程，即牛顿先后给出了引力平方的反比关系的四种证明方法：偏离量关系和比例方法、线性动力学比方法、比较动力学比方法和圆周动力学比方法。指出；牛顿《自然哲学之数学原理》的研究应该是动态的而且应以该书第一版为基准。     

Do Newton’s rules of reasoning guarantee truth … must they?

Newton’s Principia introduces four rules of reasoning for natural philosophy. Although useful, there is a concern about whether Newton’s rules guarantee truth. After redirecting the discussion from truth to validity, I show that these rules are valid insofar as they fulfill Goodman’s criteria for inductive rules and Newton’s own methodological program of experimental philosophy; provided that cross-checks are used prior to applications of rule 4 and immediately after applications of rule 2 the following activities are pursued: (1) research addressing observations that systematically deviate from theoretical idealizations and (2) applications of theory that safeguard ongoing research from proceeding down a garden path.     

Newtonianism in early Enlightenment Germany, c. 1720 to 1750: metaphysics and the critique of dogmatic philosophy

The acceptance of Newton’s ideas and Newtonianism in the early German Enlightenment is usually described as hesitant and slow. Two reasons help to explain this phenomenon. One is that those who might have adopted Newtonian arguments were critics of Wolffianism. These critics, however, drew on indigenous currents of thought, pre-dating the reception of Newton in Germany and independent of Newtonian science. The other reason is that the controversies between Wolffians and their critics focused on metaphysics. Newton’s reputation, however, was that of a mathematician, and one point, on which Wolffians and their opponents agreed, was that mathematics was of no use in the solution of metaphysical questions. The appeal to Newton as an authority in metaphysics, it was argued, was the fault of Newton’s over-zealous disciples in Britain, who tried to transform him from a mathematician into the author of a general philosophical system. It is often argued that the Berlin Academy after 1743 included a Newtonian group, but even there the reception of Newtonianism was selective. Philosophers such as Leonhard Euler were also reluctant to be labelled ‘Newtonians’, because this implied a dogmatic belief in Newton’s ideas. Only after the mid-eighteenth century is ‘Newtonianism’ increasingly accepted in the sense of a philosophical system.     

求解非线性最优化问题的Newton算法研究

本文概述了非线性规划中Newton算法的基本原理和发展，阐述了Newton算法与其他算法的混合算法，并探讨了Newton算法的超线性收敛性，从而进一步阐明了此算法的研究方向。     

Newton公式和Waring公式的等价性的讨论

本文研究了Newton公式和Waring公式的关系,揭示了两公式之间的内在联系,得到了一个重要的结论。     

基于试飞数据的固定翼飞机盘旋性能仿真分析技术

针对飞行试验过程中的盘旋性能分析问题,提出一种以试飞数据为基础的盘旋性能仿真分析方法。首先依据拉依达准则识别试飞数据中的异常值,并根据提出的移动基准区间牛顿插值方法对异常值修正;然后建立飞机盘旋运动的动力学计算模型,采用欧拉角法通过坐标变换矩阵求解飞机盘旋动力学方程,计算结果应用中心插值算法进行平滑处理。最后基于某型固定翼飞机实际飞行试验中记录的试飞数据进行算例分析,依据能量机动理论绘制完整的盘旋性能飞行包线,将理论计算结果与仿真结果进行对比表明了所建模型与仿真分析方法的有效性与正确性,为飞机的反馈设计及飞行性能的改进提供方法及依据,在工程实际应用上具有一定的可行性。     

Gravity and Newton’s Substance Counting Problem

A striking feature of Newton’s thought is the very broad reach of his empiricism, potentially extending even to immaterial substances, including God, minds, and should one exist, a non-perceiving immaterial medium. Yet Newton is also drawn to certain metaphysical principles—most notably the principle that matter cannot act where it is not—and this second, rationalist feature of his thought is most pronounced in his struggle to discover ‘gravity’s cause’. The causal problem remains vexing, for he neither invokes primary causation, nor accepts action at a distance by locating active powers in matter. To the extent that he is drawn to metaphysical principles, then, the causal problem is that of discovering some non-perceiving immaterial medium. Yet Newton’s thought has a third striking feature, one with roots in the other two: he allows that substances of different kinds might simultaneously occupy the very same region of space. I elicit the implications of these three features. For Newton to insist upon all three would transform the causal question about gravity into an insoluble problem about apportioning active powers. More seriously, it would undermine his means of individuating substances, provoking what I call ‘Newton’s Substance Counting Problem’.