带挠性梁的充液飞行器边界控制

考虑在惯性空间中全充液挠性飞行器的控制模型,轻挠性梁一端固于刚体,另一端自由。系统动力学方程由主刚体欧拉方程、液体的平均化Ｈｅｌｍｈｏｌｔｚ方程和梁的欧拉方程耦合而成。研究表明,借用适当的作用于梁自由端的边界控制,作用于主刚体的控制力矩及作用于液体“等效刚体”的阻尼力矩,能使整个系统稳定。     

Ising格子的分子热力学模型

从统计力学出发，结合Ｍｏｎｔｅ Ｃａｒｌｏ分子模拟的结果，导出了Ｉｓｉｎｇ格子的混合亥氏函数模型。该模型能非常满意地预测Ｉｓｉｎｇ格子的液液共存线，其结果明显优于Ｆｌｏｒｙ－Ｈｕｇｇｉｎｓ理论，也优于Ｆｒｅｅｄ理论。     

基于超构材料设计吸声降噪结构的研究进展

噪声污染是重要的环境问题,研究如何设计吸声结构以降低环境中的噪声一直是一项富有挑战性的课题。相比于传统材料,超构材料因其低频吸声的突出优势,成为目前设计研究的热点。首先介绍2种主要的声学吸收机制：声学黏滞性理论和热传导理论。在此基础上,阐述了吸声结构的基本设计分析方法,包括阻抗分析方法、数值计算方法以及实验方法,其中阻抗分析方法主要介绍了阻抗匹配理论和复频率平面分析方法。接着,根据目前吸声结构的设计研究现状进行分类,深入介绍基于超构材料设计的研究进展,讨论了其实际应用和可能的发展方向,最后从结构设计、工作频带、结构尺寸、吸声效果方面对基于超材料的吸声结构进行了总结,并分析了其在实际应用和不同工况下面临的挑战。     

R~2中变形Helmholtz方程的某些边值问题

在空间物理,核物理,激光和电子技术等应用领域,有很多与Helmholtz方程以及变形Helmholtz方程相关的边值问题,但目前针对性的研究成果还很少.研究了变形Helmholtz方程的一类Riemann-Hilbert边值问题,利用复方程相关理论,讨论了在不同条件下其解的存在性和唯一性,并得出了可解性定理,利用获得的结果,讨论了单位圆G上的二阶变形Helmholtz方程的斜微商边值问题.     

三维Helmholtz方程的高阶紧致差分方法

提出了三维Helmholtz方程等距网格上的一种四阶精度19点紧致差分格式。结合多重网格V循环算法和红黑高斯-塞德尔迭代法进行求解,并与二阶中心差分格式进行了比较。计算结果验证了本文方法的精确性和有效性。     

一种多绕组磁场发生器的设计

文章依据亥姆霍兹线圈原理提出了一种多绕组结构的磁场发生器设计方案,利用Maxwell软件对其进行模拟仿真分析,并制作了一套多绕组磁场发生器。通过对比实际测量数值与模拟仿真数值,证明了该设备能产生0～2T的磁场,在中心区域磁感应强度的不均匀性小于3%,得到了预期效果。     

关于电磁波场问题的研究

讨论了电磁场矢量E和B的Helmholtz定理的合理形式,提出了将旋量场方程化为一个标量场方程求解的问题,然后给出了求解电磁波场并矢格林函数的新方法。     

变系数Helmholtz方程本征值问题差分近似的六阶校正法

给出了变系数Helmholtz方程的六阶高精度校正法。此校正过程几乎不增加工作量，而校正后精度比未校正提高了四阶，并能提供后验误差估计。同时，对于常系数Helmholtz方程，给出了八阶校正格式。     

Signs, toy models, and the a priori: from Helmholtz to Wittgenstein

The Marburg neo-Kantians argue that Hermann von Helmholtz’s empiricist account of the a priori does not account for certain knowledge, since it is based on a psychological phenomenon, trust in the regularities of nature. They argue that Helmholtz’s account raises the ‘problem of validity’ (Gültigkeitsproblem): how to establish a warranted claim that observed regularities are based on actual relations. I reconstruct Heinrich Hertz’s and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Bild theoretic answer to the problem of validity: that scientists and philosophers can depict the necessary a priori constraints on states of affairs in a given system, and can establish whether these relations are actual relations in nature. The analysis of necessity within a system is a lasting contribution of the Bild theory. However, Hertz and Wittgenstein argue that the logical and mathematical sentences of a Bild are rules, tools for constructing relations, and the rules themselves are meaningless outside the theory. Carnap revises the argument for validity by attempting to give semantic rules for translation between frameworks. Russell and Quine object that pragmatics better accounts for the role of a priori reasoning in translating between frameworks. The conclusion of the tale, then, is a partial vindication of Helmholtz’s original account.     

Helmholtz's Kant revisited (Once more). The all-pervasive nature of Helmholtz's struggle with Kant's Anschauung

In this analysis, the classical problem of Hermann von Helmholtz's (1821–1894) Kantianism is explored from a particular vantage point, that to my knowledge, has not received the attention it deserves notwithstanding its possible key role in disentangling Helmholtz's relation to Kant's critical project. More particularly, we will focus on Helmholtz's critical engagement with Kant's concept of intuition [Anschauung] and (the related issue of) his dissatisfaction with Kant's doctrinal dualism. In doing so, it soon becomes clear that both (i) crucially mediated Helmholtz's idiosyncratic appropriation and criticism of (certain aspects of) Kant's critical project, and (ii) can be considered as a common denominator in a variety of issues that are usually addressed separately under the general header of (the problem of) Helmholtz's Kantianism. The perspective offered in this analysis can not only shed interesting new light on some interpretive issues that have become commonplace in discussions on Helmholtz's Kantianism, but also offers a particular way of connecting seemingly unrelated dimensions of Helmholtz's engagement with Kant's critical project (e.g. Helmholtz's views on causality and space). Furthermore, it amounts to the rather surprising conclusion that Helmholtz's most drastic revision of Kant's project pertains to his assumption of free will as a formal condition of experience and knowledge.