狭义相对论对经典物理学改造的评析

19世纪末,牛顿的绝对时空观在微观领域不能解释新出现的实验的事实,使经典物理学遭遇到空前的危机。在此基础上,爱因斯坦创建了狭义相对论,使时空观发生了重大变革。文章着重评析了这次物理学变革中狭义相对论对经典物理学的改造。     

激光等离子体相互作用中自生通道的形成

激光在等离子体中传播时形成的自生通道、成丝已被实验所观察,由于激光与等离子体相互作用时各种非线性效应十分复杂,通道形成的机理还存在争议,本文主要介绍目前等离子通道形成的几种模式及一些重要实验结果,并提出一种新的通道形成的机制。     

惯性系与加速系的坐标变换求解

通过洛伦兹变换和狭义相对论动力学公式if=(du)/(dτ)推导出惯性系与加速系的坐标变换,进一步得到加速系的度规。表明加速系问题可以纳入狭义相对论体系。     

Science denial as a form of pseudoscience

Science denialism poses a serious threat to human health and the long-term sustainability of human civilization. Although it has recently been rather extensively discussed, this discussion has rarely been connected to the extensive literature on pseudoscience and the science-pseudoscience demarcation. This contribution argues that science denialism should be seen as one of the two major forms of pseudoscience, alongside of pseudotheory promotion. A detailed comparison is made between three prominent forms of science denialism, namely relativity theory denialism, evolution denialism, and climate science denialism. Several characteristics are identified that distinguish science denialism from other forms of pseudoscience, in particular its persistent fabrication of fake controversies, the extraordinary male dominance among its activists, and its strong connection with various forms of right-wing politics. It is argued that the scientific response to science denialism has to be conceived with these characteristics in mind. In particular, it is important to expose the fabricated fake controversies for what they are and to reveal how science denialists consistently use deviant criteria of assent to distort the scientific process.     

随机量子空间理论关于粒子物理及宇宙学：统一场论新版本

随机量子空间（SQS）理论是统一场论新版本,基于三个基本假设：高斯几率假设、质数假设、真空子假设。据此建立起理论框架,导出的许多结果与实验数据相符。     

Pansystms physics:A new philosophy,mathematics and technology on nature and physics(Ⅰ)

A new research on physics and philosophy of nature fromthe pansystems view is presented here, including the related framework,concepts and theorems.     

General Relativity and the Standard Model: Why evidence for one does not disconfirm the other

General Relativity and the Standard Model often are touted as the most rigorously and extensively confirmed scientific hypotheses of all time. Nonetheless, these theories appear to have consequences that are inconsistent with evidence about phenomena for which, respectively, quantum effects and gravity matter. This paper suggests an explanation for why the theories are not disconfirmed by such evidence. The key to this explanation is an approach to scientific hypotheses that allows their actual content to differ from their apparent content. This approach does not appeal to ceteris-paribus qualifiers or counterfactuals or similarity relations. And it helps to explain why some highly idealized hypotheses are not treated in the way that a thoroughly refuted theory is treated but instead as hypotheses with limited domains of applicability.     

<三一理论>的最新发展

<三一理论>是时间--空间--质量--能量理论的最新发展.文章简介了<三一理论>的发展过程,论述了<狭义三一理论>的结论对只有一个重质量的动力系统(例如太阳系)依然成立,是<狭义三一理论>过渡到<广义三一理论>的第一篇文章.文章虽短,意义深远.     

Three Levels of Understanding of Special Relativity

1.IMRODUCTIONThefirstcompleteformulation(henceofunderstanding)ofspecialrelativity(SR)wasduetoEinsteinwhoPOstulatedtheinvarianceoflightspeedinvacuo.Thisassumptionappearedhighlynonintuitive.Actuallyitseemedabsurdthatafterhavingmeasuredthespeedofthelightemittedbyasource,oneshouldmeasurethesamevaluewhenapproaching(ordrivingawayfrom)thesamesourceoflight.ItwasthegreatmeritofMansouriandSexl[l]tohaveshownthatthelightspeedinagivendirectionisindependentofthereferencesystemSprovidedtheclocksofSbe…