依托课外科技文化活动,培养大学生的创新能力——本科教学《评估方案》中两观测点之实证研究

通过解读《普通高等学校本科教学工作水平评估方案（试行）》中的两个观测点——“课外科技文化活动”和“学生的创新精神与实践能力”，探讨了重庆文理学院近年来在这些观测点所做的努力．以此证明，开展课外科技文化活动是培养大学生创新能力的重要途径．     

信息超载下理科大学生人文素质教育初探

本文分析当前理科大学生人文素质教育的状况,阐述加强理科大学生人文素质教育的重要意义,并提出了加强理科大学生人文素质教育的主要途径和方法。     

Philosophy of chemistry and the image of science

The philosophical analysis of chemistry has advanced at such a pace during the last dozen years that the existence of philosophy of chemistry as an autonomous discipline cannot be doubted any more. The present paper will attempt to analyse the experience of philosophy of chemistry at the, so to say, meta-level. Philosophers of chemistry have especially stressed that all sciences need not be similar to physics. They have tried to argue for chemistry as its own type of science and for a pluralistic understanding of science in general. However, when stressing the specific character of chemistry, philosophers do not always analyse the question ‘What is science?’ theoretically. It is obvious that a ‘monistic’ understanding of science should not be based simply on physics as the epitome of science, regarding it as a historical accident that physics has obtained this status. The author’s point is that the philosophical and methodological image of science should not be chosen arbitrarily; instead, it should be theoretically elaborated as an idealization (theoretical model) substantiated on the historical practice of science. It is argued that although physics has, in a sense, justifiably obtained the status of a paradigm of science, chemistry, which is not simply a physical science, but a discipline with a dual character, is also relevant for elaborating a theoretical model of science. The theoretical model of science is a good tool for examining various issues in philosophy of chemistry as well as in philosophy of science or science studies generally.     

A New Discipline of Science-The Study of Open Complex Giant System and Its Methodology

This paper introduces the conception of open complex giant system and the methodology for dealing with the system, with stress on its profound significance in development of science and technology. The authors conclude that the reductionism underlying the exact science is not suitable to open complex giant system, and the only feasible alternative is the meta-synthetic engineering from the qualitative to the quantitative.     

我院工科毕业设计存在的问题和改革策略

强调了毕业设计是工科特别是职业技术师范院校本科学生一门十分重要的必修实践课程。分析了我院工科本科专业毕业设计的现状及所存在的问题后,着重阐述了全面提高毕业设计质量的改革策略。     

经部科技文献述要

中国古代留下了大量的典籍，其中保存了极为丰富的科技史料．这里介绍了经部类著作的源流及类型，着重归纳分析了《周易》、《尚书》和《诗经》中的科技史料及其价值．     

提高学生科技能力,培养信息技术创新人才

培养计算机与电子信息技术的创新人才是信息产业发展的需要．本文介绍我们在培养学生的创新精神 和科技能力,提高学生分析问题和实际解决问题能力等方面的一些思考和具体的做法．     

美国初中级教育中对自然科学教师的培养及职业标准

对自然科学教师的培养及职业标准的研究是当代世界各国教育改革的焦点之一。本文试就美国对初中级教育中对自然科学教师的职业准备及其培养标准加以介绍和描述,特别是对美国七十年代以来对自然科学教育由重视到不重视再到重视的具体过程分析,以此为我国自然科学教师的培养提供借鉴作用。     

科技英、俄语虚拟语气的简要比较

本文就科技英语和科技俄语的虚拟语气进行了简要对比。     

Methodological foundations of systems methodologies

In social systems science generally, and in management science particularly, recent developments in the variety of types of specific problem-solving methodologies (under the rubric of hard and soft systems approaches) have given an impetus to a line of inquiry, as well as debate on the nature of those methodologies. On the one hand, there has been the view that what we are witnessing is a form of Kuhnian crisis. On the other hand, a complementarist view of developments has been argued and a contingency approach proposed. But one thing has been common among the competing views: a belief that the prospects for further advances in the design and application of those methodologies, and in resolving the current controversies, lie in serious attempts to reconsider and clarify the underlying metatheoretical assumptions and concerns. This paper is an attempt to contribute to such an endeavor. A brief exposition of three methodological foundations (namely, empiricism, hermeneutics, and critique) is made, not only with the purpose of highlighting the nature as well as the limits of their epistemological and ethical claims, but also as a basis for illuminating both the nature of contemporary work on systems inquiry, design, and problem solving and the ongoing debate on what constitutes appropriate criteria for choice of specific methodologies.