Human sweat components — Attractancy and repellency to mosquitoes

Zusammenfassung Es wird gezeigt, dass menschliche Schweissabsonderungen verschiedener Versuchspersonen auf weibliche Moskitos (Aedes aegypti) verschieden attraktiv sind. Mit Diethyläther (pH 1) lassen sich im Schweiss sowohl «anlockende» wie auch «abschreckende» Bestandteile extrahieren. Für den «repellent effect» sind teilweise gleiche Mischungen von Milchsäure und Milchsäureanhydrid verantwortlich. Zwei weitere, noch nicht identifizierte Substanzen zeigten im Zwei-Kammer-Olfaktometer identische «repellent» Wirkungen.

---

---

This study was supported by U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, Dept. of the Army, Contracts No. DA 49-193-MD-2465 (W. Skinner) and No. DA 49-193-MD-2466 (H. Maibach). We thank Dr.L. Pope, Superintendent, and the inmates of the California Medical Faculty, Vacaville, California, USA, for their cooperation in this study.     

Activities of catecholamines on the rat muscle glycogenolytic (β-2) receptor

Zusammenfassung Es wird gezeigt, dass der Glykogen-Rezeptor im Rattenmuskel vom Standpunkt der Reaktion mit den Katecholaminen als-2 anzusehen ist.     

Der Eigenartige Einfluß Witelos auf die Entwicklung der Dioptrik

Summary Witelo's Perspectiva, which was printed three times in the sixteenth century, profoundly influenced the science of dioptrics until the Age of Newton. Above all, the optical authors were interested in the so-called Vitellian tables, which Witelo must have copied from the nearly forgotten optical Sermones of Claudius Ptolemy. Research work was often based on these tables. Thus Kepler relied on the Vitellian tables when he invented his law of refraction. Several later authors adopted Kepler's law, not always because they believed it to be true, but because they did not know of any better law. Also Harriot used the Vitellian tables until his own experiments convinced him that Witelo's angles were grossly inaccurate. Unfortunately Harriot kept his results and his sine law for himself and for a few friends. The sine law was not published until 1637, by Descartes, who gave an indirect proof of it. Although this proof consisted in the first correct calculation of both rainbows, accomplished by means of the sine law, the Jesuits Kircher (Ars Magna, 1646) and Schott (Magia Optica, 1656) did not mention the sine law. Marci (Thaumantias, 1648) did not know of it, and Fabri (Synopsis Opticæ, 1667) rejected it. It is true that the sine law was accepted by authors like Maignan (Perspectiva Horaria, 1648) and Grimaldi (Physico-Mathesis, 1665), but since they used the erroneous Vitellian angles for computing the refractive index, they discredited the sine law by inaccurate and even ludicrous results.That even experimental determinations might be unduly biased by the Vitellian angles is evident from the author's graphs of seventeenth century refractive angles. These graphs also show how difficult it was to measure such angles accurately, and how the Jesuit authors of the 1640's adapted their experimental angles to the traditional Vitellian ones. Witelo's famous angles, instead of furthering the progress of dioptrics, delayed it. Their disastrous influence may be traced for nearly thirty years after Descartes had published the correct law of refraction.

---

---

Vorgelegt von C. Truesdell     

Pharmacological studies with some new antihypertensive aminoquinazolines

Zusammenfassung 4 neue Aminoquinazolin-Derivate, die den Blutdruck von Hunden und Katzen herabsetzen, werden beschrieben. Ihre wirksamen Dosen liegen im Bereiche von 20 bis 300µg/kg peroral. Diese Substanzen setzen den peripheren Widerstand herab und reduzieren die blutdrucksteigernde Wirkung von Adrenalin, unterscheiden sich aber von den typischen-Sympatholytika.