排球运动中的供能特点与营养补充

物质和能量代谢是人体各组织器官机能活动的基础，应用运动时物质和能量代谢规律指导训练期间的营养安排是非常有益的．通过对排球运动的特点进行分析，结合各供能系统的特点以及各种能量物质分解的先后关系，简要陈述排球比赛中的物质和能量代谢，分析了排球运动中疲劳产生的可能原因，有针对性地提出训练中的营养安排以及应当注意补充的几种营养物质。     

拓扑分子格的弱分离公理

本文是文［１］的继续，我们以Ｑ－远域为工具，首先引入和研究了拓扑分子格的ＳＴｉ分离公理（ｉ＝－１，０，１，２，３，４）。其次我们引入了Ｓ－不定序同态和Ｓ－同胚序同态等概念，给出了它们的若干特征性质。最后我们得到了各种ＳＴｉ分离公理是Ｓ－同胚序同态下保持不变的性质。     

阶段原型法及其支持环境

本文介绍了阶段原型法(SPA)及其支持环境(PEMIS)的总体结构和主要功能,探讨了知识库和推理机制在循环控制中的作用,以及软件重用技术、图形接口技术和应用生成技术等实现技术。     

关于C_(11)A_7·CaF_2稳定性的研究

本文采用X射线衍射分析方法,研究了影响C_(11)A_7·CaF_2稳定性的因素,结果表明C_(11)A_7·CaF_2在1450℃以内,能够稳定存在;Mgo,K_2O对C_(11)A_7·CaF_2稳定性没有影响;Na_2O、P_2O_5和CaO能与C_(11)A_7·CaF_2发生反应、分别生成少量NC_6A_3、Ca_5F(PO_4)_3和C_3A,但在硅酸盐水泥熟料的正常煅烧制度下,反应程度较低,对C_(11)A_7·CaF_2稳定性不大.熟料中铝酸盐相存在的形式,主要取决于氟在熟料中的分布,CaF_2掺量较低,温度超过1350℃,C_(11)A_7CaF_2消失,生成C_3A;CaG_2掺量较高时,温度高达1450℃,熟料中的铝酸盐相仍为C_(11)A_7·CaF_2,而不生成C_2A.     

粉粒状物料透气性系数的测定

对经过分级的六种均齐粉粒状物料进行透气性系数测定。结果表明:球形小米颗粒((?)_p=1.70mm),透气性系数K=1.191×10~(-9)m~2,在整个固定床范围内都符合达西定律;石灰石粉((?)_P=0.900mm),K=5.831×10~(-10)m~2。文中还讨论了达西定律的适用依据和透气性系数的影响因素。     

新型连续装载机工作机构的图解设计法

本文介绍了新型连续装载机工作机构图解设计的一般规律,对某些技术参数的确定作了初步探讨。     

Ruin Probability with Variable Premium Rate and Disturbed by Diffusion in a Markovian Environment

We consider a risk model with a premium rate which varies with the level of free reserves. In this model, the occurrence of claims is described by a Cox process with Markov intensity process, and the influence of stochastic factors is considered by adding a diffusion process. The integro-differential equation for the ruin probability is derived by a infinitesimal method.     

宿舍智能化管理系统的研制

研制开发的宿舍智能化管理系统可以实现对宿舍楼中的人员和财产进行管理,同时还能实现对整个宿舍楼寝室的定时语音提醒和呼叫功能.     

Newton's Easy Quadratures ``Omitted for the Sake of Brevity'

In the 1687 Principia, Newton gave a solution to the direct problem (given the orbit and center of force, find the central force) for a conic-section with a focal center of force (answer: a reciprocal square force) and for a spiral orbit with a polar center of force (answer: a reciprocal cube force). He did not, however, give solutions for the two corresponding inverse problems (given the force and center of force, find the orbit). He gave a cryptic solution to the inverse problem of a reciprocal cube force, but offered no solution for the reciprocal square force. Some take this omission as an indication that Newton could not solve the reciprocal square, for, they ask, why else would he not select this important problem? Others claim that ``it is child's play' for him, as evidenced by his 1671 catalogue of quadratures (tables of integrals). The answer to that question is obscured for all who attempt to work through Newton's published solution of the reciprocal cube force because it is done in the synthetic geometric style of the 1687 Principia rather than in the analytic algebraic style that Newton employed until 1671. In response to a request from David Gregory in 1694, however, Newton produced an analytic version of the body of the proof, but one which still had a geometric conclusion. Newton's charge is to find both ``the orbit' and ``the time in orbit.' In the determination of the dependence of the time on orbital position, t(r), Newton evaluated an integral of the form ∫dx/x <sup>n</sup> to calculate a finite algebraic equation for the area swept out as a function of the radius, but he did not write out the analytic expression for time t = t(r), even though he knew that the time t is proportional to that area. In the determination of the orbit, θ (r), Newton obtained an integral of the form ∫dx/√(1−x<sup>2</sup>) for the area that is proportional to the angle θ, an integral he had shown in his 1669 On Analysis by Infinite Equations to be equal to the arcsin(x). Since the solution must therefore contain a transcendental function, he knew that a finite algebraic solution for θ=θ(r) did not exist for ``the orbit' as it had for ``the time in orbit.' In contrast to these two solutions for the inverse cube force, however, it is not possible in the inverse square solution to generate a finite algebraic expression for either ``the orbit' or ``the time in orbit.' In fact, in Lemma 28, Newton offers a demonstration that the area of an ellipse cannot be given by a finite equation. I claim that the limitation of Lemma 28 forces Newton to reject the inverse square force as an example and to choose instead the reciprocal cube force as his example in Proposition 41. (Received August 14, 2002) Published online March 26, 2003 Communicated by G. Smith     

物理实验课程的改革探索

本文对大学物理实验课程教学的现状进行了分析,并讨论了大学生学好物理实验的有效方法。