关于细集料砂当量指标的探讨

通过加土的方法得到不同泥土含量的集料，进行砂当量试验，并用不同砂当量值的集料制成成心性稀浆封层混合料进行湿轮磨耗试验，试验结果表明，砂当量与集料中的泥土含量存在良好的线性关系，是评价细集料洁净程度的有效方法，试验中集料级配和取样均匀程度会对试验结果产生一定影响，砂当量低的集料会使改性剂无法发 对心性稀浆封层混合料的改性效果，建议用于心性稀浆封层的的细集料砂当量不低于60％。     

建筑物的改造与加固

建筑物的改造与加固是一项技术性和实践性很强的工作。设计方案制定前要重视资料的收集和分析。主要的加固措施是用高强度的材料与被加固的物体紧密连接以提高被加固体的强度,常见的方法有加大截面法、植筋法或碳纤维布粘贴加固法等。     

体育培养学生创新和实践能力研究

本文通过对学生创新能力的研究，探讨学生创新能力的内涵，揭示目前培养学生创造力在体育教学中存在的问题，寻求培养学生创新能力的途径和方法，提出教学改革的设想。     

文化生产场域中符号权力的形成--以文学艺术场域的分析为例

文化生产场域的生成不仅为文化生产者提供了游戏的空间,同时也区分了文化资本的富有者和贫乏者,文化资本数量上的落差导致了符号权力关系的建立;对文化资本功效和意义的认可赋予了它足够的价值,在价值认可的基础上,文化生产者的符号权力得以合法化;而文化资本的符号特性往往会造成文化生产者本身的符号化,关于作者的各种神话被创造出来,他们的符号权力因而得到进一步强化。     

Ruin Probability with Variable Premium Rate and Disturbed by Diffusion in a Markovian Environment

We consider a risk model with a premium rate which varies with the level of free reserves. In this model, the occurrence of claims is described by a Cox process with Markov intensity process, and the influence of stochastic factors is considered by adding a diffusion process. The integro-differential equation for the ruin probability is derived by a infinitesimal method.     

关于教育技术专业课程建设的若干思考

在分析了教育技术专业现在面临的许多外界环境变化的同时 ,从市场、商品经济学的有关角度 ,提出了关于教育技术专业本科课程设置的几点想法 ,并在实践的基础上给出了一些具体的做法     

一种数字图像的快速并行算法

利用Foufier一阶光滑离散化的分析，提出了对图像增强进行并行化处理，在同等存贮环境中，并行算法优于串行算法，从而为图形并行处理提出了一种快速方法。     

加快图书馆现代化进程的思考

回顾了太原市图书馆评估定级的准备工作，分析了其在现代化进程中的优势与不足。从组织管理现代化、人员培养现代化、信息服务手段现代化、投资机制现代化等方面论述了加快图书馆现代化进程的对策。     

一种基于通行需求度的单交叉口模糊控制算法

针对城市交通拥挤问题，提出一种根据通行需求度确定通行相位和通行时间的、可变相序的单交叉口模糊控制算法。仿真结果表明，在不同交叉口结构形式、不同相位构成和不同车流量组合的各种情况下，该方法均表现出良好的控制效果，是解决城市交通拥挤问题的有效途径。     

Newton's Easy Quadratures ``Omitted for the Sake of Brevity'

In the 1687 Principia, Newton gave a solution to the direct problem (given the orbit and center of force, find the central force) for a conic-section with a focal center of force (answer: a reciprocal square force) and for a spiral orbit with a polar center of force (answer: a reciprocal cube force). He did not, however, give solutions for the two corresponding inverse problems (given the force and center of force, find the orbit). He gave a cryptic solution to the inverse problem of a reciprocal cube force, but offered no solution for the reciprocal square force. Some take this omission as an indication that Newton could not solve the reciprocal square, for, they ask, why else would he not select this important problem? Others claim that ``it is child's play' for him, as evidenced by his 1671 catalogue of quadratures (tables of integrals). The answer to that question is obscured for all who attempt to work through Newton's published solution of the reciprocal cube force because it is done in the synthetic geometric style of the 1687 Principia rather than in the analytic algebraic style that Newton employed until 1671. In response to a request from David Gregory in 1694, however, Newton produced an analytic version of the body of the proof, but one which still had a geometric conclusion. Newton's charge is to find both ``the orbit' and ``the time in orbit.' In the determination of the dependence of the time on orbital position, t(r), Newton evaluated an integral of the form ∫dx/x <sup>n</sup> to calculate a finite algebraic equation for the area swept out as a function of the radius, but he did not write out the analytic expression for time t = t(r), even though he knew that the time t is proportional to that area. In the determination of the orbit, θ (r), Newton obtained an integral of the form ∫dx/√(1−x<sup>2</sup>) for the area that is proportional to the angle θ, an integral he had shown in his 1669 On Analysis by Infinite Equations to be equal to the arcsin(x). Since the solution must therefore contain a transcendental function, he knew that a finite algebraic solution for θ=θ(r) did not exist for ``the orbit' as it had for ``the time in orbit.' In contrast to these two solutions for the inverse cube force, however, it is not possible in the inverse square solution to generate a finite algebraic expression for either ``the orbit' or ``the time in orbit.' In fact, in Lemma 28, Newton offers a demonstration that the area of an ellipse cannot be given by a finite equation. I claim that the limitation of Lemma 28 forces Newton to reject the inverse square force as an example and to choose instead the reciprocal cube force as his example in Proposition 41. (Received August 14, 2002) Published online March 26, 2003 Communicated by G. Smith