背越式跳高教学中应用多媒体技术的实践与探讨

在背越式跳高教学中实行多媒体组合教学 ,改进传统单一的教学方式 ,加深了学生对技术本质特征的理解 ,经教学实验对比 ,教学效果明显提高 .并具体分析探讨了开展多媒体教学的优越性和重要性     

电熔AZS材料中各晶相的形貌学研究

研究晶体的生长形态与形成该形态的物理化学条件,最终控制显微结构的形成,是材料科学的重要研究任务。本文研究了工业应用的电熔AZS材料中出现斜锆石晶相,刚玉斜锆石共晶体、斜锆石-莫来石共晶体的形貌。从凝固过程出发,运用界面结构理论及成分过冷等概念,对AZS材料中各晶相的形貌及其形成的物理化学条件关联起来进行了讨论。     

浅议中学数学的高观点研究

本文从培养合格的中学数学技师的角度,论述了运用高观点研究初等数学的重要性,提出了此项研究的内容、途径和方法。     

酵母菌耐性与海藻糖积累的初步研究

对 11株酵母菌进行了渗透压、乙酸、冷冻、乙醇耐性实验及海藻糖积累的比较。实验表明 ,渗透压耐性和乙酸耐性较好的菌株 ,其积累海藻糖的能力较强 ;而抗冷冻和乙醇耐性与海藻糖的积累能力无明显的相关性。     

L－Fuzzy极不连通空间

给出了ＬＦ极不连通空间的具有层次特点的新定义，从而使连通性与极不连通性两个概念更为协调；证明了此定义是“Ｌ－好的推广”。     

先秦黄钟律管考——利用现代声学公式推测先秦黄钟律管管径的尝试

《吕氏春秋》记载的黄钟律管长度为三寸九分，而汉代后，古人普遍采纳黄钟九寸。为了研究先秦黄钟律管真实长度，对文献进行系统地考证，发现《吕氏春秋》记载的三寸九分黄钟律管应为清黄钟律管，发音当是九寸管的高八度。文献研究亦表明了先秦古人听声定律的事实，即三寸九分律管和九寸律管都为听声定律产物。由此，根据声学公式，结合文献考证，计算了黄钟律管的管径，结论为：先秦律管应是竹管，管径范围约是0．71寸。同时，考证了黄钟律管八寸十分一说和八寸七分一说，认为这两种说法都不可靠。     

Ruin Probability with Variable Premium Rate and Disturbed by Diffusion in a Markovian Environment

We consider a risk model with a premium rate which varies with the level of free reserves. In this model, the occurrence of claims is described by a Cox process with Markov intensity process, and the influence of stochastic factors is considered by adding a diffusion process. The integro-differential equation for the ruin probability is derived by a infinitesimal method.     

DCS和FCS及其在火电厂中的应用

介绍了集散控制系统和现场总线控制系统，并对它们在火电厂中的应用做了分析。     

Newton's Easy Quadratures ``Omitted for the Sake of Brevity'

In the 1687 Principia, Newton gave a solution to the direct problem (given the orbit and center of force, find the central force) for a conic-section with a focal center of force (answer: a reciprocal square force) and for a spiral orbit with a polar center of force (answer: a reciprocal cube force). He did not, however, give solutions for the two corresponding inverse problems (given the force and center of force, find the orbit). He gave a cryptic solution to the inverse problem of a reciprocal cube force, but offered no solution for the reciprocal square force. Some take this omission as an indication that Newton could not solve the reciprocal square, for, they ask, why else would he not select this important problem? Others claim that ``it is child's play' for him, as evidenced by his 1671 catalogue of quadratures (tables of integrals). The answer to that question is obscured for all who attempt to work through Newton's published solution of the reciprocal cube force because it is done in the synthetic geometric style of the 1687 Principia rather than in the analytic algebraic style that Newton employed until 1671. In response to a request from David Gregory in 1694, however, Newton produced an analytic version of the body of the proof, but one which still had a geometric conclusion. Newton's charge is to find both ``the orbit' and ``the time in orbit.' In the determination of the dependence of the time on orbital position, t(r), Newton evaluated an integral of the form ∫dx/x <sup>n</sup> to calculate a finite algebraic equation for the area swept out as a function of the radius, but he did not write out the analytic expression for time t = t(r), even though he knew that the time t is proportional to that area. In the determination of the orbit, θ (r), Newton obtained an integral of the form ∫dx/√(1−x<sup>2</sup>) for the area that is proportional to the angle θ, an integral he had shown in his 1669 On Analysis by Infinite Equations to be equal to the arcsin(x). Since the solution must therefore contain a transcendental function, he knew that a finite algebraic solution for θ=θ(r) did not exist for ``the orbit' as it had for ``the time in orbit.' In contrast to these two solutions for the inverse cube force, however, it is not possible in the inverse square solution to generate a finite algebraic expression for either ``the orbit' or ``the time in orbit.' In fact, in Lemma 28, Newton offers a demonstration that the area of an ellipse cannot be given by a finite equation. I claim that the limitation of Lemma 28 forces Newton to reject the inverse square force as an example and to choose instead the reciprocal cube force as his example in Proposition 41. (Received August 14, 2002) Published online March 26, 2003 Communicated by G. Smith     

论法律部门的划分标准与经济法的地位

传统法律部门的划分因其片面强调客观性和按法律调整的社会关系的性质来划分法律部门而有着固有的、难以弥补的缺陷，因此要令人信服地说明经济法作为独立的部门法的地位，就必须抛弃旧的框框，按主客观一致，以主观为主导的指导思想。重新来确定法律部门的划分标准。