大惯性转台准确定位的自调整控制方法

对于大惯性转台的控制 ,提出了自调整控制算法 ,利用历史信息实现转台减速点的智能调整 ,给出了减速点计算公式 ,解决了大惯性转台快速运行与准确定位的矛盾 .利用Matlab对系统进行了建模仿真研究 ,得到了满意效果 ,证明了自调整算法的有效性 .     

4－氧代戊酸酯类缩酮的合成研究

本文以糠醇为原料，以醇作溶剂，在酸性条件下糖醇开环制得一系列乙酞丙酸酯类化合物。然后再以乙酞丙酸酯类化合物为原料，制得一系列未见报道的此类酯与醇的缩合产物，并用ＨＰ５９８８ＧＣ－ＭＳ联用仪研究了反应产物的组成。     

接地电阻对放电击中点的影响

采用对比性试验,研究了接地电阻对火花放电击中点的影响.试验结果和观测均表明,接地电阻能抑制从接地端产生的迎面放电的发展速度和通道强度,从而使其被击中概率下降,负极性比正极性下接地电阻对火花放电击中点的影响要显著得多.     

复合支护结构核爆冲击波等效静载的不确定性分析

根据中值点处展开的一次二阶矩法讨论了土中压缩波的升压时间及其不确定性，然后研究了按单自由度体系进行复合支护地下结构抗核爆设计时的动力系数（荷载系数）和等效静载的变异系数．数值结果表明，土中压缩波升压时间的不确定性，不仅与结构埋深和土参数的变异性有关，而且与土参数的均值有关，等效静载的不确定性，依赖于作用于结构上的动载变异性和结构自振频率变异性，而动载不确定性对等效静载变异性影响最大     

红色旅游发展模式探讨

美国、法国、德国等发达国家将历史传统教育置于亲身参与背景下,收到了很好的效果,积累了丰富的经验,提供了很好的借鉴。以革命纪念地、纪念物为载体的“红色旅游”是爱国主义教育、历史教育的重要组成部分,注重参与、体验的构建,“寓教于乐”,很可能是目前红色旅游的一个具有很大潜力的发展模式。     

计算学科中的实验体系

本文讨论了计算学科中的实验体系,阐述了建立实验体系的框架,进入实验规划和实施方案和内容,讨论了实验改革和创新的思路,以及建立软件实验、虚拟实验的探索和建立移动实验室的构想。     

Ruin Probability with Variable Premium Rate and Disturbed by Diffusion in a Markovian Environment

We consider a risk model with a premium rate which varies with the level of free reserves. In this model, the occurrence of claims is described by a Cox process with Markov intensity process, and the influence of stochastic factors is considered by adding a diffusion process. The integro-differential equation for the ruin probability is derived by a infinitesimal method.     

语言判断矩阵的一致性及相关问题研究

研究了语言判断矩阵的一致性及基于语言判断矩阵的方案排序问题.在给出语言判断矩阵有关概念的基础上,通过对有序语言短语集中的有序语言短语进行"量化",给出了语言间相互作用的运算定义,探讨了语言短语及语言判断矩阵的基本性质,进一步从理论上提出了语言判断矩阵完全一致性和满意一致性的概念;为了方便检验语言判断矩阵的一致性,通过引入导出矩阵的概念将语言判断矩阵转化为数量矩阵,并提出了语言判断矩阵完全一致性、满意一致性的简便的判定方法;针对基于语言判断矩阵的方案排序问题,根据导出矩阵的性质通过求解最大特征根,给出了一种简便的方案排序方法;最后通过两个算例说明了本文给出的一致性判定方法和方案排序方法.     

三型聚丙烯管材挤出工艺探讨

文章结合PP－R成型设备的特点和PP－R原料的性能，对管材的挤出工艺进行了比较详细的分析，通过对挤出成型中重要的工艺参数的影响进行了研究。     

Newton's Easy Quadratures ``Omitted for the Sake of Brevity'

In the 1687 Principia, Newton gave a solution to the direct problem (given the orbit and center of force, find the central force) for a conic-section with a focal center of force (answer: a reciprocal square force) and for a spiral orbit with a polar center of force (answer: a reciprocal cube force). He did not, however, give solutions for the two corresponding inverse problems (given the force and center of force, find the orbit). He gave a cryptic solution to the inverse problem of a reciprocal cube force, but offered no solution for the reciprocal square force. Some take this omission as an indication that Newton could not solve the reciprocal square, for, they ask, why else would he not select this important problem? Others claim that ``it is child's play' for him, as evidenced by his 1671 catalogue of quadratures (tables of integrals). The answer to that question is obscured for all who attempt to work through Newton's published solution of the reciprocal cube force because it is done in the synthetic geometric style of the 1687 Principia rather than in the analytic algebraic style that Newton employed until 1671. In response to a request from David Gregory in 1694, however, Newton produced an analytic version of the body of the proof, but one which still had a geometric conclusion. Newton's charge is to find both ``the orbit' and ``the time in orbit.' In the determination of the dependence of the time on orbital position, t(r), Newton evaluated an integral of the form ∫dx/x <sup>n</sup> to calculate a finite algebraic equation for the area swept out as a function of the radius, but he did not write out the analytic expression for time t = t(r), even though he knew that the time t is proportional to that area. In the determination of the orbit, θ (r), Newton obtained an integral of the form ∫dx/√(1−x<sup>2</sup>) for the area that is proportional to the angle θ, an integral he had shown in his 1669 On Analysis by Infinite Equations to be equal to the arcsin(x). Since the solution must therefore contain a transcendental function, he knew that a finite algebraic solution for θ=θ(r) did not exist for ``the orbit' as it had for ``the time in orbit.' In contrast to these two solutions for the inverse cube force, however, it is not possible in the inverse square solution to generate a finite algebraic expression for either ``the orbit' or ``the time in orbit.' In fact, in Lemma 28, Newton offers a demonstration that the area of an ellipse cannot be given by a finite equation. I claim that the limitation of Lemma 28 forces Newton to reject the inverse square force as an example and to choose instead the reciprocal cube force as his example in Proposition 41. (Received August 14, 2002) Published online March 26, 2003 Communicated by G. Smith