网络环境下新型物理教学模式探索

论述了利用意义建构学习理论进行物理教学和网络整合的方法和途径,阐述了网络环境下意义建构物理教学模式的优点.     

基于Laguerre函数模型的多变量广义预测自适应控制

通过对Laguerre函数模型结构的分析 ,把多变量广义预测自适应控制方法应用于该模型中 ,利用Laguerre函数模型近似控制对象系统结构 ,将模型中间参量的辨识和模型的预测输出有效的统一了起来 ,克服了单纯基于参数化模型预测控制通常需要已知系统的时延和阶次的局限 ,为适合该类模型的工业对象应用提供一种有参考价值的控制方法。     

OPTIMAL SETTING-UP OF KNITTING ELEMENTS AND ITS EFFECT ON TENSION VARIATION

The dynamic yarn tension variations during knitting cycle are very difficult to control and be-come one of barriers to knitting on modern warp knitting machine.Examination of experimentaldata and theoretical analysis show that the relative position of spring rail to knitting elements suchas needle,guide as well as their displacement has noticeable effect on tension variation so that theknitting condition can be much improved by rearrangement of the knitting elements and theirmovement within a knitting cycle.     

QSTEM技术中晶面指数的模糊逼近

本文阐述了 QSTEM 技术中获得的晶面夹角值与晶面指数之间的位相关系,提出了测量值与理论值的隶属度,建立了测量值与晶面指数之间的模糊关系——矩阵 A,通过两个例子,说明了模糊逼近的具体方法以及参数 T、m 和算子 H 等的具体意义。     

圆电流平面内磁场分布的测量

本文设计了一个测量圆电流平面内磁场分布的实验,实验结果与理论计算能很好地吻合。从而证明该实验设计是可行的。     

冶炼工业废气中SO_2的脱除研究

研究用软锰矿的水悬浮液脱除冶炼工业废气中SO_2的工艺可行性,提出抑制副产物MnS_2O_6生成的途径。     

利用MAX813L防止应用程序出现死循环故障

介绍了利用CPU监控芯片MAX813L防止应用程序出现死循环的方法，使用表明该方法是可行的。     

Ruin Probability with Variable Premium Rate and Disturbed by Diffusion in a Markovian Environment

We consider a risk model with a premium rate which varies with the level of free reserves. In this model, the occurrence of claims is described by a Cox process with Markov intensity process, and the influence of stochastic factors is considered by adding a diffusion process. The integro-differential equation for the ruin probability is derived by a infinitesimal method.     

数字化文献——《中国期刊全文数据库（CJFD）》

系统地介绍了《中国期刊全文数据库(CArt)》的特点、应用、服务方式以及检索界面、检索使用方法和全文浏览器的下栽安装，旨在使更多的人了解CJFD，掌握CJFD的使用方法。提高CJFD的利用率。     

Newton's Easy Quadratures ``Omitted for the Sake of Brevity'

In the 1687 Principia, Newton gave a solution to the direct problem (given the orbit and center of force, find the central force) for a conic-section with a focal center of force (answer: a reciprocal square force) and for a spiral orbit with a polar center of force (answer: a reciprocal cube force). He did not, however, give solutions for the two corresponding inverse problems (given the force and center of force, find the orbit). He gave a cryptic solution to the inverse problem of a reciprocal cube force, but offered no solution for the reciprocal square force. Some take this omission as an indication that Newton could not solve the reciprocal square, for, they ask, why else would he not select this important problem? Others claim that ``it is child's play' for him, as evidenced by his 1671 catalogue of quadratures (tables of integrals). The answer to that question is obscured for all who attempt to work through Newton's published solution of the reciprocal cube force because it is done in the synthetic geometric style of the 1687 Principia rather than in the analytic algebraic style that Newton employed until 1671. In response to a request from David Gregory in 1694, however, Newton produced an analytic version of the body of the proof, but one which still had a geometric conclusion. Newton's charge is to find both ``the orbit' and ``the time in orbit.' In the determination of the dependence of the time on orbital position, t(r), Newton evaluated an integral of the form ∫dx/x <sup>n</sup> to calculate a finite algebraic equation for the area swept out as a function of the radius, but he did not write out the analytic expression for time t = t(r), even though he knew that the time t is proportional to that area. In the determination of the orbit, θ (r), Newton obtained an integral of the form ∫dx/√(1−x<sup>2</sup>) for the area that is proportional to the angle θ, an integral he had shown in his 1669 On Analysis by Infinite Equations to be equal to the arcsin(x). Since the solution must therefore contain a transcendental function, he knew that a finite algebraic solution for θ=θ(r) did not exist for ``the orbit' as it had for ``the time in orbit.' In contrast to these two solutions for the inverse cube force, however, it is not possible in the inverse square solution to generate a finite algebraic expression for either ``the orbit' or ``the time in orbit.' In fact, in Lemma 28, Newton offers a demonstration that the area of an ellipse cannot be given by a finite equation. I claim that the limitation of Lemma 28 forces Newton to reject the inverse square force as an example and to choose instead the reciprocal cube force as his example in Proposition 41. (Received August 14, 2002) Published online March 26, 2003 Communicated by G. Smith