Understanding and tuning the epitaxy of large aromatic adsorbates by molecular design

If the rich functionality of organic molecules is to be exploited in devices such as light-emitting diodes or field-effect transistors, interface properties of organic materials with various (metallic and insulating) substrates must be tailored carefully. In many cases, this calls for well-ordered interfaces. Organic epitaxy-that is, the growth of molecular films with a commensurate structural relationship to their crystalline substrates--relies on successful recognition of preferred epitaxial sites. For some large pi-conjugated molecules ('molecular platelets') this works surprisingly well, even if the substrate exhibits no template structure into which the molecules can lock. Here we present an explanation for site recognition in non-templated organic epitaxy, and thus resolve a long-standing puzzle. We propose that this form of site recognition relies on the existence of a local molecular reaction centre in the extended pi-electron system of the molecule. Its activity can be controlled by appropriate side groups and--in a certain regime--may also be probed by molecularly sensitized scanning tunnelling microscopy. Our results open the possibility of engineering epitaxial interfaces, as well as other interfacial nanostructures for which specific site recognition is essential.     

Action plans used in action observation

How do we understand the actions of others? According to the direct matching hypothesis, action understanding results from a mechanism that maps an observed action onto motor representations of that action. Although supported by neurophysiological and brain-imaging studies, direct evidence for this hypothesis is sparse. In visually guided actions, task-specific proactive eye movements are crucial for planning and control. Because the eyes are free to move when observing such actions, the direct matching hypothesis predicts that subjects should produce eye movements similar to those produced when they perform the tasks. If an observer analyses action through purely visual means, however, eye movements will be linked reactively to the observed action. Here we show that when subjects observe a block stacking task, the coordination between their gaze and the actor's hand is predictive, rather than reactive, and is highly similar to the gaze-hand coordination when they perform the task themselves. These results indicate that during action observation subjects implement eye motor programs directed by motor representations of manual actions and thus provide strong evidence for the direct matching hypothesis.