Structure,biosynthesis and functions of glycoprotein glycans

Since the pioneering work on structure and function of heteroglycans compiled in the classical books edited by A. Gottschalk in 1972¹, there have been several promising developments in glycoconjugate research, as reviewed in this article.In Part 1, contributed by A. Kobata, current knowledge on heteroglycan structures is presented and representative examples taken from higher organisms are given. Part 2, written by J. F. G. Vliegenthart and J. P. Kamerling, covers the most important achievements in methodology: procedures to obtain pure glycans and to analyze their structures. Part 3, contributed by J. Paulson, is devoted to biosynthesis of glycans now describable as pathways since several of the glycosyltransferases have been isolated and analyzed for specificity. In Part 4, contributed by E. Buddecke, current knowledge on functional roles of glycans is presented. It will become apparent that the prerequisite for valid work either in biosynthetic or functional context depends on solid structural information. This is particularly true whenever glycosyltransferase reaction products are being analyzed, or glycans involved in biological functions are investigated. Although in past years, a great deal of important knowledge has been gathered by use of crude glycosidase or glycosyltransferase activities (a notable example is found in reference 2), one may now postulate that glycans implicated in biological reactions should be thoroughly analyzed.This review may familiarize newcomers with the field of glycoconjugate research with special emphasis on glycoprotein glycans. Glycolipids are not included in this article as they have recently been reviewed by S. I. Hakomori³. The reader is also referred to several excellent monographs^4,5 and the Proceedings of the Glycoconjugate Symposia held biannually^6–8.     

The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem: Mathematization as Exploration

This paper discerns two types of mathematization, a foundational and an explorative one. The foundational perspective is well-established, but we argue that the explorative type is essential when approaching the problem of applicability and how it influences our conception of mathematics. The first part of the paper argues that a philosophical transformation made explorative mathematization possible. This transformation took place in early modernity when sense acquired partial independence from reference. The second part of the paper discusses a series of examples from the history of mathematics that highlight the complementary nature of the foundational and exploratory types of mathematization.     

Science writing in Greco-Roman antiquity

Surprisingly little attention has been given hitherto to the definition of the laboratory. A space has to be specially adapted to deserve that title. It would be easy to assume that the two leading experimental sciences, physics and chemistry, have historically depended in a similar way on access to a laboratory. But while chemistry, through its alchemical ancestry with batteries of stills, had many fully fledged laboratories by the seventeenth century, physics was discovering the value of mathematics. Even experimental physics was content to make use of almost any indoor space, if not outdoors, ignoring the possible value of a laboratory. The development of the physics laboratory had to wait until the nineteenth century.     

Tetraspanin15 regulates cellular trafficking and activity of the ectodomain sheddase ADAM10

A disintegrin and metalloproteinase10 (ADAM10) has been implicated as a major sheddase responsible for the ectodomain shedding of a number of important surface molecules including the amyloid precursor protein and cadherins. Despite a well-documented role of ADAM10 in health and disease, little is known about the regulation of this protease. To address this issue we conducted a split-ubiquitin yeast two-hybrid screen to identify membrane proteins that interact with ADAM10. The yeast experiments and co-immunoprecipitation studies in mammalian cell lines revealed tetraspanin15 (TSPAN15) to specifically associate with ADAM10. Overexpression of TSPAN15 or RNAi-mediated knockdown of TSPAN15 led to significant changes in the maturation process and surface expression of ADAM10. Expression of an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention mutant of TSPAN15 demonstrated an interaction with ADAM10 already in the ER. Pulse-chase experiments confirmed that TSPAN15 accelerates the ER-exit of the ADAM10-TSPAN15 complex and stabilizes the active form of ADAM10 at the cell surface. Importantly, TSPAN15 also showed the ability to mediate the regulation of ADAM10 protease activity exemplified by an increased shedding of N-cadherin and the amyloid precursor protein. In conclusion, our data show that TSPAN15 is a central modulator of ADAM10-mediated ectodomain shedding. Therapeutic manipulation of its expression levels may be an additional approach to specifically regulate the activity of the amyloid precursor protein alpha-secretase ADAM10.     

Mutations in CTC1, encoding conserved telomere maintenance component 1, cause Coats plus

Coats plus is a highly pleiotropic disorder particularly affecting the eye, brain, bone and gastrointestinal tract. Here, we show that Coats plus results from mutations in CTC1, encoding conserved telomere maintenance component 1, a member of the mammalian homolog of the yeast heterotrimeric CST telomeric capping complex. Consistent with the observation of shortened telomeres in an Arabidopsis CTC1 mutant and the phenotypic overlap of Coats plus with the telomeric maintenance disorders comprising dyskeratosis congenita, we observed shortened telomeres in three individuals with Coats plus and an increase in spontaneous γH2AX-positive cells in cell lines derived from two affected individuals. CTC1 is also a subunit of the α-accessory factor (AAF) complex, stimulating the activity of DNA polymerase-α primase, the only enzyme known to initiate DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Thus, CTC1 may have a function in DNA metabolism that is necessary for but not specific to telomeric integrity.     

The knockout mouse project

Mouse knockout technology provides a powerful means of elucidating gene function in vivo, and a publicly available genome-wide collection of mouse knockouts would be significantly enabling for biomedical discovery. To date, published knockouts exist for only about 10% of mouse genes. Furthermore, many of these are limited in utility because they have not been made or phenotyped in standardized ways, and many are not freely available to researchers. It is time to harness new technologies and efficiencies of production to mount a high-throughput international effort to produce and phenotype knockouts for all mouse genes, and place these resources into the public domain.     

Immunization against cobra venom

Zusammenfassung Durch Behandlung mit Glutardialdehyd wirdNaja-naja-Gift weitgehend entgiftet. Einzeldosen bis zu 20 mg pro Kaninchen können ohne Nebenwirkungen injiziert werden. Durch Immunisierung von Kaninchen wird eine gute Antikörperbildung gegenNajanaja-Gift — und vor allem auch gegen die niedermolekularen Toxine — erzielt.     

Agonist/endogenous peptide-MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity

Alphabeta T lymphocytes are able to detect even a single peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on the surface of an antigen-presenting cell. This is despite clear evidence, at least with CD4+ T cells, that monomeric ligands are not stimulatory. In an effort to understand how this remarkable sensitivity is achieved, we constructed soluble peptide-MHC heterodimers in which one peptide is an agonist and the other is one of the large number of endogenous peptide-MHCs displayed by presenting cells. We found that some specific combinations of these heterodimers can stimulate specific T cells in a CD4-dependent manner. This activation is severely impaired if the CD4-binding site on the agonist ligand is ablated, but the same mutation on an endogenous ligand has no effect. These data correlate well with analyses of lipid bilayers and cells presenting these ligands, and indicate that the basic unit of helper T cell activation is a heterodimer of agonist peptide- and endogenous peptide-MHC complexes, stabilized by CD4.