Ubiquitin-proteasome system

The capacity for exquisite regulation of ubiquitylation provides eukaryotic cells with a means to fine-tune both protein function and levels. This complex set of processes affects myriad proteins and potentially impacts all cellular processes. Ubiquitylation is brought about through multienzyme processes, with specificity conferred primarily by interactions of substrates with specific ubiquitin protein ligases (E3s) in association with ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2s). Regulation of ubiquitylation occurs at multiple levels, including E2-E3 interactions, substrate recognition, chain elongation, binding of ubiquitin to conserved motifs and deubiquityation. This review presents the fundamentals of the ubiquitin conjugating system.     

FHA-RING ubiquitin ligases in cell division cycle control

Despite the common occurrence of forkhead associated (FHA) phosphopeptide-binding domains and really interesting new gene (RING) E3 ubiquitin ligase domains, gene products containing both an N-terminal FHA domain and C-terminal RING domain constitute a highly distinctive intersection. Characterized FHA-RING ligases include the two vertebrate proteins, Checkpoint with FHA and RING (Chfr) and RING finger 8 (Rnf8), as well as three fungal proteins, Defective in mitosis (Dma1), Chf1 and Chf2. These FHA-RING ligases play roles in negative regulation of the cell division cycle, apparently by coupling protein phosphorylation events to specific ubiquitylation of target proteins. Here, the available data on upstream and downstream regulation of and by FHA-RING ligases are reviewed. Received 24 April 2008; received after revision 18 June 2008; accepted 20 June 2008     

Enzyme–substrate relationships in the ubiquitin system: approaches for identifying substrates of ubiquitin ligases

Protein ubiquitylation is an important post-translational modification, regulating aspects of virtually every biochemical pathway in eukaryotic cells. Hundreds of enzymes participate in the conjugation and deconjugation of ubiquitin, as well as the recognition, signaling functions, and degradation of ubiquitylated proteins. Regulation of ubiquitylation is most commonly at the level of recognition of substrates by E3 ubiquitin ligases. Characterization of the network of E3–substrate relationships is a major goal and challenge in the field, as this expected to yield fundamental biological insights and opportunities for drug development. There has been remarkable success in identifying substrates for some E3 ligases, in many instances using the standard protein–protein interaction techniques (e.g., two-hybrid screens and co-immunoprecipitations paired with mass spectrometry). However, some E3s have remained refractory to characterization, while others have simply not yet been studied due to the sheer number and diversity of E3s. This review will discuss the range of tools and techniques that can be used for substrate profiling of E3 ligases.     

The HERC proteins: functional and evolutionary insights

HERC proteins are defined as containing both HECT and RCC1-like domains in their amino acid sequences. Six HERC genes have turned up in the human genome which encode two different sorts of polypeptides: while the small HERC proteins possess little more than the two aforementioned domains, the large ones are giant proteins with a plethora of potentially important regions. It is now almost 10 years since the discovery of the first family member and information is starting to accumulate pointing to a general role for these proteins as ubiquitin ligases involved in membrane-trafficking events. In this review, the available data on these six members are discussed, together with an account of their evolution.Received 16 March 2005; received after revision 13 April 2005; accepted 28 April 2005     

Class III adenylyl cyclases: molecular mechanisms of catalysis and regulation

Class III adenylyl cyclases are the most abundant type of cyclic AMP-producing enzymes. The adjustment of the cellular levels of this second messenger is achieved by a variety of regulatory mechanisms which couple signals to adenylyl cyclase activity. Because of the divergent nature of stimuli which impinge on these enzymes, highly individualized class III adenylyl cyclases have evolved in metazoans, eukaryotic unicells and bacteria. Regulation usually exploits the dimeric structure of the catalyst, whose active centres form at the dimer interface. The fold of the catalytic domains and the basic catalytic mechanisms are similar in all class III adenylyl cyclases, and substrate binding generally closes the active site by an induced-fit mechanism. Regulatory inputs can result in dramatic rearrangements of the catalytic domains within the dimer, which often are based on rotational movements. Received 13 February 2006; received after revision 16 March 2006; accepted 20 April 2006     

The role of deubiquitinating enzymes in apoptosis

It has become apparent that ubiquitination plays a critical role in cell survival and cell death. In addition, deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) have been determined to be highly important regulators of these processes. Cells can be subjected to various stresses and respond in a variety of different ways ranging from activation of survival pathways to the promotion of cell death, which eventually eliminates damaged cells. The regulatory mechanisms of apoptosis depend on the balanced action between ubiquitination and deubiquitination systems. There is a growing recognition that DUBs play essential roles in regulating several binding partners to modulate the process of apoptosis. Thus, the interplay between the timing of DUB activity and the specificity of ubiquitin attachment and removal from its substrates during apoptosis is important to ensure cellular homeostasis. This review discusses the role of a few ubiquitin-specific DUBs that are involved in either promoting or suppressing the process of apoptosis.     

Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase regulatory mechanisms and inhibition in treating diabetes, heart ischemia, and cancer

The fraction of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) in the active form is reduced by the activities of dedicated PD kinase isozymes (PDK1, PDK2, PDK3 and PDK4). Via binding to the inner lipoyl domain (L2) of the dihydrolipoyl acetyltransferase (E2 60mer), PDK rapidly access their E2-bound PD substrate. The E2-enhanced activity of the widely distributed PDK2 is limited by dissociation of ADP from its C-terminal catalytic domain, and this is further slowed by pyruvate binding to the N-terminal regulatory (R) domain. Via the reverse of the PDC reaction, NADH and acetyl-CoA reductively acetylate lipoyl group of L2, which binds to the R domain and stimulates PDK2 activity by speeding up ADP dissociation. Activation of PDC by synthetic PDK inhibitors binding at the pyruvate or lipoyl binding sites decreased damage during heart ischemia and lowered blood glucose in insulin-resistant animals. PDC activation also triggers apoptosis in cancer cells that selectively convert glucose to lactate. Received 25 August 2006; received after revision 20 November 2006; accepted 20 December 2006     

Recruitment and retention: factors that affect pericyte migration

Pericytes are critical for vascular morphogenesis and contribute to several pathologies, including cancer development and progression. The mechanisms governing pericyte migration and differentiation are complex and have not been fully established. Current literature suggests that platelet-derived growth factor/platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β, sphingosine 1-phosphate/endothelial differentiation gene-1, angiopoietin-1/tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like and EGF-like domains 2, angiopoietin-2/tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like and EGF-like domains 2, transforming growth factor β/activin receptor-like kinase 1, transforming growth factor β/activin receptor-like kinase 5, Semaphorin-3A/Neuropilin, and matrix metalloproteinase activity regulate the recruitment of pericytes to nascent vessels. Interestingly, many of these pathways are directly affected by secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC). Here, we summarize the function of these factors in pericyte migration and discuss if and how SPARC might influence these activities and thus provide an additional layer of control for the recruitment of vascular support cells. Additionally, the consequences of targeted inhibition of pericytes in tumors and the current understanding of pericyte recruitment in pathological environments are discussed.     

RIPK4 activity in keratinocytes is controlled by the SCF<Superscript>β-TrCP</Superscript> ubiquitin ligase to maintain cortical actin organization

RIPK4 is a key player in epidermal differentiation and barrier formation. RIPK4 signaling pathways controlling keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation depend on its kinase activity leading to Dvl2, Pkp1 and IRF6 phosphorylation and NF-κB activation. However, the mechanism regulating RIPK4 activity levels remains elusive. We show that cultured keratinocytes display constitutive active phosphorylated RIPK4 while PKC signaling can trigger RIPK4 activation in various non-keratinocyte cell lines, in which RIPK4 is present in a non-phosphorylated state. Interestingly, we identified the SCF^β-TrCP ubiquitin E3 ligase complex responsible for regulating the active RIPK4 protein level. The SCF^β-TrCP complex binds to a conserved phosphodegron motif in the intermediate domain of RIPK4, subsequently leading to K48-linked ubiquitinylation and degradation. The recruitment of β-TrCP is dependent on RIPK4 activation and trans-autophosphorylation. β-TrCP knock-down resulted in RIPK4-dependent formation of actin stress fibers, cell scattering and increased cell motility, suggesting that tight control of RIPK4 activity levels is crucial to maintain cell shape and behavior in keratinocytes.     

Mechanistic principles of RAF kinase signaling

The RAF family of kinases are key components acting downstream of receptor tyrosine kinases and cells employ several distinct mechanisms to strictly control their activity. RAF transitions from an inactive state, where the N-terminal regulatory region binds intramolecularly to the C-terminal kinase domain, to an open state capable of executing the phosphoryl transfer reaction. This transition involves changes both within and between the protein domains in RAF. Many different proteins regulate the transition between inactive and active states of RAF, including RAS and KSR, which are arguably the two most prominent regulators of RAF function. Recent developments have added several new twists to our understanding of RAF regulation. Among others, dimerization of the RAF kinase domain is emerging as a crucial step in the RAF activation process. The multitude of regulatory protein–protein interactions involving RAF remains a largely untapped area for therapeutic applications.     

Trafficking and stability of voltage-gated calcium channels

Voltage-gated calcium channels are important mediators of calcium influx into electrically excitable cells. The amount of calcium entering through this family of channel proteins is not only determined by the functional properties of channels embedded in the plasma membrane but also by the numbers of channels that are expressed at the cell surface. The trafficking of channels is controlled by numerous processes, including co-assembly with ancillary calcium channel subunits, ubiquitin ligases, and interactions with other membrane proteins such as G protein coupled receptors. Here we provide an overview about the current state of knowledge of calcium channel trafficking to the cell membrane, and of the mechanisms regulating the stability and internalization of this important ion channel family.     

SET domain protein lysine methyltransferases: Structure, specificity and catalysis

Site- and state-specific lysine methylation of histones is catalyzed by a family of proteins that contain the evolutionarily conserved SET domain and plays a fundamental role in epigenetic regulation of gene activation and silencing in all eukaryotes. The recently determined three-dimensional structures of the SET domains from chromosomal proteins reveal that the core SET domain structure contains a two-domain architecture, consisting of a conserved anti-parallel β-barrel and a structurally variable insert that surround a unusual knot-like structure that comprises the enzyme active site. These structures of the SET domains, either in the free state or when bound to cofactor S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine and/or histone peptide, mimicking an enzyme/cofactor/substrate complex, further yield the structural insights into the molecular basis of the substrate specificity, methylation multiplicity and the catalytic mechanism of histone lysine methylation. Received 10 June 2006; accepted 22 August 2006     

A Smurf1 tale: function and regulation of an ubiquitin ligase in multiple cellular networks

Since being discovered and intensively studied for over a decade, Smad ubiquitylation regulatory factor-1 (Smurf1) has been linked with several important biological pathways, including the bone morphogenetic protein pathway, the non-canonical Wnt pathway, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Multiple functions of this ubiquitin ligase have been discovered in cell growth and morphogenesis, cell migration, cell polarity, and autophagy. Smurf1 is related to physiological manifestations in terms of age-dependent deficiency in bone formation and invasion of tumor cells. Smurf1-knockout mice have a significant phenotype in the skeletal system and considerable manifestations during embryonic development and neural outgrowth. In depth studying of Smurf1 will help us to understand the etiopathological mechanisms of related disorders. Here, we will summarize historical and recent studies on Smurf1, and discuss the E3 ligase-dependent and -independent functions of Smurf1. Moreover, intracellular regulations of Smurf1 and related physiological phenotypes will be described in this review.     

Ubiquitin-proteasome system

The majority of proteasome substrates identified to date are marked for degradation by polyubiquitinylation. Exceptions to this principle, however, are well documented and can help us understand the process proteasomes use to recognize their substrates. Examples include ornithine decarboxylase, p21/Cip1, TCRalpha, IkappaBalpha, c-Jun, calmodulin and thymidylate synthase. Degradation of these proteins can be completely ubiquitin-independent or coexist with ubiquitin-dependent pathways. Uncoupling degradation from ubiquitin modification may reflect the evolutionary conservation of mechanisms optimized for highly specialized regulatory functions.     

Cbl signaling networks in the regulation of cell function

Cbl proteins control multiple cellular processes by acting as ubiquitin ligases and multifunctional adaptor molecules. They are involved in the control of cell proliferation, differentiation and cell morphology, as well as in pathologies such as autoimmune diseases, inflammation and cancer. Here we review recent advances in understanding the role of Cbl and the importance of a growing repertoire of Cbl-interacting proteins in the regulation of signaling pathways triggered by growth factors, antigens, cell adhesion, cytokines and hormones. We also address key issues of the nature of proteins that bind Cbl in particular cells, where they are located, and how they are altered or traffic within cells upon stimulation. It is becoming obvious that temporal and spatial changes in Cbl signaling networks are essential for the control of physiological processes in a variety of cells and organs and that their deregulation can result in the development of human diseases.Received 22 January 2003; received after revision 11 March 2003; accepted 26 March 2003     

Glycogen synthase kinase 3: A key regulator of cellular fate

The serine/threonine kinase glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) was initially identified as a key regulator of insulin-dependent glycogen synthesis. GSK-3 was subsequently shown to function in a wide range of cellular processes including differentiation, growth, motility and apoptosis. Aberrant regulation of GSK-3 has been implicated in a range of human pathologies including Alzheimer’s disease, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and cancer. As a consequence, the regulation of GSK-3 and the therapeutic potential of GSK-3 inhibitors have become key areas of investigation. This review will focus on the mechanisms of GSK-3 regulation, with emphasis on modulation by upstream signals, control of substrate specificity and GSK-3 localisation. The details of these mechanisms will be discussed in the context of specific signalling pathways. Received 30 January 2007; received after revision 5 March 2007; accepted 16 April 2007