Combination of Forecasts across Estimation Windows: An Application to Air Travel Demand

This paper applies combining forecasts of air travel demand generated from the same model but over different estimation windows. The combination approach used resorts to Pesaran and Pick (Journal of Business Economics and Statistics 2011; 29 : 307–318), but the empirical application is extended in several ways. The forecasts are based on a seasonal Box–Jenkins model (SARIMA), which is adequate to forecast monthly air travel demand with distinct seasonal patterns at the largest German airport: Frankfurt am Main. Furthermore, forecasts with forecast horizons from 1 to 12 months ahead, which are based on different average estimation windows, expanding windows and single rolling windows, are compared with baseline forecasts based on an expanding window of the observations after a structural break. The forecast exercise shows that the average window forecasts mostly outperform the alternative single window forecasts. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Level shifts,temporary changes and forecasting

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of not treating Level Shift and Temporary Change outliers on the point forecasts and prediction intervals from ARIMA models. One of the principal conclusions is that the outliers of the type discussed here considerably increase the inaccuracy of point forecasts, although the latter depends not only on the time of occurrence of the outliers from the forecast origin but also on the type of ARIMA processes under consideration. However, regardless of the time of occurrence and of the type of ARIMA processes considered, Level Shifts and Temporary Changes significantly affect the width of the prediction intervals.     

An Improved Approach for Estimating the Mean and Standard Deviation of a Subjective Probability Distribution

The literature offers many formulas for estimating the mean and standard deviation of a subjective probability distribution (a well-known example is the PERT formulas). This paper shows that some basic underlying assumptions behind most of these formulas are inappropriate; a more appropriate framework is then proposed. We then develop new formulas that can estimate mean and standard deviation much more accurately than the currently available formulas.©1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.