Checkpoint kinase 1 in DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation

Originally identified as a mediator of DNA damage response (DDR), checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) has a broader role in checkpoint activation in DDR and normal cell cycle regulation. Chk1 activation involves phosphorylation at conserved sites. However, recent work has identified a splice variant of Chk1, which may regulate Chk1 in both DDR and normal cell cycle via molecular interaction. Upon activation, Chk1 phosphorylates a variety of substrate proteins, resulting in the activation of DNA damage checkpoints, cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and/or cell death. Chk1 and its related signaling may be an effective therapeutic target in diseases such as cancer.     

Eukaryotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most detrimental form of DNA damage. Failure to repair these cytotoxic lesions can result in genome rearrangements conducive to the development of many diseases, including cancer. The DNA damage response (DDR) ensures the rapid detection and repair of DSBs in order to maintain genome integrity. Central to the DDR are the DNA damage checkpoints. When activated by DNA damage, these sophisticated surveillance mechanisms induce transient cell cycle arrests, allowing sufficient time for DNA repair. Since the term “checkpoint” was coined over 20 years ago, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing the DNA damage checkpoint has advanced significantly. These pathways are highly conserved from yeast to humans. Thus, significant findings in yeast may be extrapolated to vertebrates, greatly facilitating the molecular dissection of these complex regulatory networks. This review focuses on the cellular response to DSBs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, providing a comprehensive overview of how these signalling pathways function to orchestrate the cellular response to DNA damage and preserve genome stability in eukaryotic cells.     

Regulation of the cell cycle following DNA damage in normal and Ataxia telangiectasia cells

A proportion of the population is exposed to acute doses of ionizing radiation through medical treatment or occupational accidents, with little knowledge of the immedate effects. At the cellular level, ionizing radiation leads to the activation of a genetic program which enables the cell to increase its chances of survival and to minimize detrimental manifestations of radiation damage. Cytotoxic stress due to ionizing radiation causes genetic instability, alterations in the cell cycle, apoptosis, or necrosis. Alterations in the G1, S and G2 phases of the cell cycle coincide with improved survival and genome stability. The main cellular factors which are activated by DNA damage and interfere with the cell cycle controls are: p53, delaying the transition through the G1-S boundary; p21^WAF1/CIPI, preventing the entrance into S-phase; proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and replication protein A (RPA), blocking DNA replication; and the p53 variant protein p53as together with the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), with less defined functions during the G2 phase of the cell cycle. By comparing a variety of radioresistant cell lines derived from radiosensitive ataxia talangiectasia cells with the parental cells, some essential mechanisms that allow cells to gain radioresistance have been identified. The results so far emphasise the importance of an adequate delay in the transition from G2 to M and the inhibition of DNA replication in the regulation of the cell cycle after exposure to ionizing radiation.     

Base excision DNA repair

DNA repair is a collection of several multienzyme, multistep processes keeping the cellular genome intact against genotoxic insults. One of these processes is base excision repair, which deals with the most ubiquitous lesions in DNA: oxidative base damage, alkylation, deamination, sites of base loss and single-strand breaks, etc. Individual enzymes acting in base excision repair have been identified. The recent years were marked with many advances in understanding of their structure and many interactions that make base excision repair a functional, versatile system. This review describes the current knowledge of structural biology and biochemistry of individual steps of base excision repair, several subpathways of the common base excision repair pathway, and interactions of the repair process with other cellular processes.     

Cell fate determination during G1 phase progression

During the cell cycle, a cell may encounter one of five different fates: it can proliferate, differentiate, become quiescent or senescent, or go into apoptosis. The initiation of such fates is often seen in the G1 phase. The aim of this review is to describe an integrative model of G1 phase progression and cell fate determination. Along the G1 phase, the cell will encounter an early checkpoint after which apoptosis can result. For a quiescent state and for differentiation, the cell will exit G1 before the restriction point and a subsequent differentiation checkpoint will decide the fate of the cell, quiescence or differentiation. After the restriction point, the cell can be arrested in response to stress stimuli, such as telomere depletion, and a decision between senescence and apoptosis occurs. Received 19 June 2007; received after revision 23 July 2007; accepted 17 August 2007     

S-phase-coupled apoptosis in tumor suppression

DNA replication is essential for accurate transmission of genomic information from parental to daughter cells. DNA replication is licensed once per cell division cycle. This process is highly regulated by both positive and negative regulators. Over-replication, under-replication, as well as DNA damage in a cell all induce the activation of checkpoint control pathways such as ATM/ATR, CHK kinases, and the tumor suppressor protein p53, which provide “damage controls” via either DNA repairs or apoptosis. This review focuses on accumulating evidence, with the emphasis on recently discovered Killin, that S-phase checkpoint control is crucial for a mammalian cell to make a life and death decision in order to safeguard genome integrity.     

ATM protein kinase: the linchpin of cellular defenses to stress

ATM is the most significant molecule involved in monitoring the genomic integrity of the cell. Any damage done to DNA relentlessly challenges the cellular machinery involved in recognition, processing and repair of these insults. ATM kinase is activated early to detect and signal lesions in DNA, arrest the cell cycle, establish DNA repair signaling and faithfully restore the damaged chromatin. ATM activation plays an important role as a barrier to tumorigenesis, metabolic syndrome and neurodegeneration. Therefore, studies of ATM-dependent DNA damage signaling pathways hold promise for treatment of a variety of debilitating diseases through the development of new therapeutics capable of modulating cellular responses to stress. In this review, we have tried to untangle the complex web of ATM signaling pathways with the purpose of pinpointing multiple roles of ATM underlying the complex phenotypes observed in AT patients.     

Participation of DNA repair in the response to 5-fluorouracil

The anti-metabolite 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is employed clinically to manage solid tumors including colorectal and breast cancer. Intracellular metabolites of 5-FU can exert cytotoxic effects via inhibition of thymidylate synthetase, or through incorporation into RNA and DNA, events that ultimately activate apoptosis. In this review, we cover the current data implicating DNA repair processes in cellular responsiveness to 5-FU treatment. Evidence points to roles for base excision repair (BER) and mismatch repair (MMR). However, mechanistic details remain unexplained, and other pathways have not been exhaustively interrogated. Homologous recombination is of particular interest, because it resolves unrepaired DNA intermediates not properly dealt with by BER or MMR. Furthermore, crosstalk among DNA repair pathways and S-phase checkpoint signaling has not been examined. Ongoing efforts aim to design approaches and reagents that (i) approximate repair capacity and (ii) mediate strategic regulation of DNA repair in order to improve the efficacy of current anticancer treatments. Received 08 September 2008; received after revision 25 September 2008; accepted 03 October 2008     

Alkyltransferase-like proteins: molecular switches between DNA repair pathways

Alkyltransferase-like proteins (ATLs) play a role in the protection of cells from the biological effects of DNA alkylation damage. Although ATLs share functional motifs with the DNA repair protein and cancer chemotherapy target O ⁶-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase, they lack the reactive cysteine residue required for alkyltransferase activity, so its mechanism for cell protection was previously unknown. Here we review recent advances in unraveling the enigmatic cellular protection provided by ATLs against the deleterious effects of DNA alkylation damage. We discuss exciting new evidence that ATLs aid in the repair of DNA O ⁶-alkylguanine lesions through a novel repair cross-talk between DNA-alkylation base damage responses and the DNA nucleotide excision repair pathway.     

Roles of the DNA mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair proteins during meiosis

Numerous proteins are involved in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathways. The function and specificity of these proteins during the mitotic cell cycle has been actively investigated, in large part due to the involvement of these systems in human diseases. In contrast, comparatively little is known about their functioning during meiosis. At least three repair pathways operate during meiosis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to repair mismatches that occur as a consequence of heteroduplex formation in recombination. The first pathway is similar to the one acting during postreplicative mismatch repair in mitotically dividing cells, while two pathways are responsible for the repair of large loops during meiosis, using proteins from MMR and NER systems. Some MMR proteins also help prevent recombination between diverged sequences during meiosis, and act late in recombination to affect the resolution of crossovers. This review will discuss the current status of DNA mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair proteins during meiosis, especially in the yeast S. cerevisiae. Received 21 September 1998; received after revision 23 November 1998; accepted 23 November 1998     

Restriction endonucleases that resemble a component of the bacterial DNA repair machinery

It has long been known that most Type II restriction endonucleases share a conserved core fold and similar active-sites. The same core folding motif is also present in the MutH protein, a component of the bacterial DNA mismatch repair machinery. In contrast to most Type II restriction endonucleases, which assemble into functional dimers and catalyze double-strand breaks, MutH is a monomer and nicks hemimethylated DNA. Recent biochemical and crystallographic studies demonstrate that the restriction enzymes BcnI and MvaI share many additional features with MutH-like proteins, but not with most other restriction endonucleases. The structurally similar monomers all recognize approximately symmetric target sequences asymmetrically. Differential sensitivities to slight substrate asymmetries, which could be altered by protein engineering, determine whether the enzymes catalyze only single-strand nicks or double-strand breaks. M. Sokolowska, M. Kaus-Drobek: These authors contributed equally to this work. Received 12 March 2007; received after revision 28 April 2007; accepted 3 May 2007     

The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair

Female fertility and offspring health are critically dependent on the maintenance of an adequate supply of high-quality oocytes. Like somatic cells, oocytes are subject to a variety of different types of DNA damage arising from endogenous cellular processes and exposure to exogenous genotoxic stressors. While the repair of intentionally induced DNA double strand breaks in gametes during meiotic recombination is well characterised, less is known about the ability of oocytes to repair pathological DNA damage and the relative contribution of DNA repair to oocyte quality is not well defined. This review will discuss emerging data suggesting that oocytes are in fact capable of efficient DNA repair and that DNA repair may be an important mechanism for ensuring female fertility, as well as the transmission of high-quality genetic material to subsequent generations.     

Towards progress on DNA vaccines for cancer

Cancer immunotherapy faces many obstacles that include eliciting immune reactions to self antigens as well as overcoming tumor-derived immunosuppressive networks and evasion tactics. Within the vaccine arsenal for inhibiting cancer proliferation, plasmid DNA represents a novel immunization strategy that is capable of eliciting both humoral and cellular arms of the immune response in addition to being safely administered and easily engineered and manufactured. Unfortunately, while DNA vaccines have performed well in preventing and treating malignancies in animal models, their overall application in human clinical trials has not impacted cancer regression to date. Since the establishment of these early trials, progress has been made in terms of increasing DNA vaccine immunogenicity and subverting the suppressive properties of tumor cells. Therefore, the success of future plasmid DNA use in cancer patients will depend on combinatorial strategies that enhance and direct the DNA vaccine immune response while also targeting tumor evasion mechanisms. Received 2 April 2007; received after revision 14 May 2007; accepted 21 May 2007     

Protecting DNA from errors and damage: an overview of DNA repair mechanisms in plants compared to mammals

The genome integrity of all organisms is constantly threatened by replication errors and DNA damage arising from endogenous and exogenous sources. Such base pair anomalies must be accurately repaired to prevent mutagenesis and/or lethality. Thus, it is not surprising that cells have evolved multiple and partially overlapping DNA repair pathways to correct specific types of DNA errors and lesions. Great progress in unraveling these repair mechanisms at the molecular level has been made by several talented researchers, among them Tomas Lindahl, Aziz Sancar, and Paul Modrich, all three Nobel laureates in Chemistry for 2015. Much of this knowledge comes from studies performed in bacteria, yeast, and mammals and has impacted research in plant systems. Two plant features should be mentioned. Plants differ from higher eukaryotes in that they lack a reserve germline and cannot avoid environmental stresses. Therefore, plants have evolved different strategies to sustain genome fidelity through generations and continuous exposure to genotoxic stresses. These strategies include the presence of unique or multiple paralogous genes with partially overlapping DNA repair activities. Yet, in spite (or because) of these differences, plants, especially Arabidopsis thaliana, can be used as a model organism for functional studies. Some advantages of this model system are worth mentioning: short life cycle, availability of both homozygous and heterozygous lines for many genes, plant transformation techniques, tissue culture methods and reporter systems for gene expression and function studies. Here, I provide a current understanding of DNA repair genes in plants, with a special focus on A. thaliana. It is expected that this review will be a valuable resource for future functional studies in the DNA repair field, both in plants and animals.